Cur Deus Homo
{"WorkMasterId":4902,"WpPageId":243018,"ParentWpPageId":193766,"Slug":"cur-deus-homo","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/cur-deus-homo/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/cur-deus-homo/","HasFullText":true,"RawHtmlLength":71799,"CleanHtmlLength":16420,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Cur Deus Homo","Deck":"The incarnation and atonement can be given a rational account through justice, satisfaction, human obligation, and divine mercy.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Anselm of Canterbury","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Anselm of Canterbury","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/anselm-of-canterbury-03-a-late-16th-century-engraving-of-anselm.jpg","ImageAlt":"Late-Sixteenth-Century Engraving of Anselm","FilterTerra":"Eastern Mediterranean","ClickText":"Anselm of Canterbury","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/","Copies":["1033 CE – 1109 CE","Aosta","Benedictine philosopher-theologian from Aosta whose faith-seeking-understanding method, ontological argument, account of truth, freedom, sin, atonement, and semantic analysis shaped medieval scholastic philosophy."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:2","Title":"Medieval History","DateText":"500 CE – 1499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:5","Title":"High Medieval","DateText":"1000 CE – 1299 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/philosophers-of-high-medieval/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1098 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Approximate completion year during Anselm\u0027s archiepiscopal exile; not a documented day/date.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:6"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:ITA:2"}],"OriginalTitle":"Cur Deus Homo","Language":"Latin","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-religion"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:ethics"}],"Tradition":"Latin scholasticism; Augustinian Christian philosophy; medieval philosophical theology","FullText":{"Title":"Full Text","Copy":"Full text is available on a separate page for readability.","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/cur-deus-homo/full-text/","Label":"Full Text","Kicker":"Open full text","Cards":[{"Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/cur-deus-homo/full-text/","Label":"Full Text","Kicker":"Open full text"}]},"CoreThesis":["The incarnation and atonement can be given a rational account through justice, satisfaction, human obligation, and divine mercy."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Why God Became Man","KeyConcepts":"atonement, satisfaction, incarnation, justice, sin, Boso, necessity, mercy, rational account","Methodology":"Dialogue using rational explanation to address why God became human and how redemption answers sin.","Structure":"Two-book dialogue between Anselm and Boso on incarnation, sin, satisfaction, and redemption."},"Arguments":["Anselm argues that human sin creates an obligation that only a God-human can fittingly satisfy, giving a rational account of incarnation and atonement."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Augustine, Latin theology, monastic dialogue, episcopal controversy and exile.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted core treatise and Anselm\u0027s major work on incarnation and atonement.","Central to theories of atonement, justice, debt, satisfaction, and rational theology."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as an authenticated Anselm dialogue. Date follows the late-1090s completion tradition as a proxy."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"RawSection","Title":"Full Versions","BodyHtml":"\u003cdiv class=\"dz-philo__full-version-grid\"\u003e\n \u003carticle class=\"dz-philo__full-version-card\"\u003e\n \u003cp class=\"dz-philo__full-version-provider\"\u003eCCEL\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ch3 class=\"dz-philo__full-version-title\"\u003eProslogium Monologium Gaunilon Appendix and Cur Deus Homo\u003c/h3\u003e\n \u003cp class=\"dz-philo__full-version-meta\"\u003eCollectedWork · LinkOnlyReady\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ca class=\"dz-philo__full-version-link\" href=\"https://ccel.org/ccel/anselm/basic_works/basic_works\"\u003eOpen full version\u003c/a\u003e\n \u003c/article\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e"},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["The incarnation and atonement can be given a rational account through justice, satisfaction, human obligation, and divine mercy."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Why God Became Man"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"atonement, satisfaction, incarnation, justice, sin, Boso, necessity, mercy, rational account"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Dialogue using rational explanation to address why God became human and how redemption answers sin."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"Two-book dialogue between Anselm and Boso on incarnation, sin, satisfaction, and redemption."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Anselm argues that human sin creates an obligation that only a God-human can fittingly satisfy, giving a rational account of incarnation and atonement."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Augustine, Latin theology, monastic dialogue, episcopal controversy and exile."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Scholastic soteriology, philosophy of religion, moral theology, later atonement theory."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted core treatise and Anselm\u0027s major work on incarnation and atonement.","Central to theories of atonement, justice, debt, satisfaction, and rational theology."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as an authenticated Anselm dialogue. Date follows the late-1090s completion tradition as a proxy."]},{"Kind":"SplitFullTextSection","Title":"Full Text","Copy":"Full text is available on a separate page for readability.","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/cur-deus-homo/full-text/","Label":"Full Text","Kicker":"Open full text","Cards":[{"Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/cur-deus-homo/full-text/","Label":"Full Text","Kicker":"Open full text"}]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Full Versions","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note","Full Text"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":12,"Sections":25,"Styles":3,"Scripts":1}}