The First Tetralogy
{"WorkMasterId":4906,"WpPageId":243084,"ParentWpPageId":193708,"Slug":"the-first-tetralogy","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/antiphon-of-athens/the-first-tetralogy/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/antiphon-of-athens/the-first-tetralogy/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":68220,"CleanHtmlLength":14966,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"The First Tetralogy","Deck":"A model homicide case tests how probability, motive, evidence, and counterargument can be arranged for prosecution and defense.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Antiphon of Athens","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/antiphon-of-athens/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Antiphon of Athens","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/antiphon-of-athens/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/antiphon-of-athens-01-oxyrhynchus-papyrus-on-truth-fragment.jpg","ImageAlt":"Oxyrhynchus papyrus fragment of Antiphon On Truth","FilterTerra":"Eastern Mediterranean","ClickText":"Antiphon of Athens","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/antiphon-of-athens/","Copies":["480 BCE – 411 BCE","Rhamnus, Attica","Athenian logographer and sophistic thinker from Rhamnus whose homicide speeches, Tetralogies, and fragments on truth and concord explored law, nature, justice, rhetoric, equality, and political order."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:1","Title":"Ancient History","DateText":"3000 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:3","Title":"Classical Antiquity","DateText":"500 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/philosophers-of-classical-antiquity/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"438 BCE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Proxy ordering year within scholarly date ranges; exact composition date is not documented.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:8"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:GRC:2"}],"OriginalTitle":"Τετραλογία αʹ","Language":"Ancient Greek","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:logic"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:ethics"}],"Tradition":"Attic oratory; sophistic philosophy; fifth-century Athenian political thought","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["A model homicide case tests how probability, motive, evidence, and counterargument can be arranged for prosecution and defense."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"First Tetralogy; Tetralogy I","KeyConcepts":"tetralogy, homicide, probability, eikos, forensic argument, justice, rebuttal, evidence","Methodology":"Paired model speeches using antithetical reasoning and probable argument rather than a continuous historical case.","Structure":"Four model speeches: accusation, defense, second accusation, and second defense."},"Arguments":["The work stages how each side can turn likelihood, motive, and circumstance into opposing accounts of justice and responsibility."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Athenian homicide procedure, sophistic argument, early rhetorical teaching, civic law courts.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Part of the accepted combined Antiphon corpus because the Tetralogies preserve philosophical rhetoric about probability, justice, and legal reasoning.","Useful for rhetoric, informal logic, legal reasoning, argumentation theory, and ancient ethics."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted under the user-selected combined Orator+Sophist treatment. The evidence artifact notes that Antiphon of Rhamnus and Antiphon the Sophist remain disputed identities; this page intentionally combines them and marks the dates as the orator/Rhamnus chronology."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["A model homicide case tests how probability, motive, evidence, and counterargument can be arranged for prosecution and defense."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"First Tetralogy; Tetralogy I"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"tetralogy, homicide, probability, eikos, forensic argument, justice, rebuttal, evidence"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Paired model speeches using antithetical reasoning and probable argument rather than a continuous historical case."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"Four model speeches: accusation, defense, second accusation, and second defense."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["The work stages how each side can turn likelihood, motive, and circumstance into opposing accounts of justice and responsibility."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Athenian homicide procedure, sophistic argument, early rhetorical teaching, civic law courts."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Attic rhetoric, forensic logic, later rhetorical training, Aristotle on probability and persuasion."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Part of the accepted combined Antiphon corpus because the Tetralogies preserve philosophical rhetoric about probability, justice, and legal reasoning.","Useful for rhetoric, informal logic, legal reasoning, argumentation theory, and ancient ethics."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted under the user-selected combined Orator+Sophist treatment. The evidence artifact notes that Antiphon of Rhamnus and Antiphon the Sophist remain disputed identities; this page intentionally combines them and marks the dates as the orator/Rhamnus chronology."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}