How Substances Are Good in Virtue of Their Existence Without Being Substantial Goods
{"WorkMasterId":5304,"WpPageId":257631,"ParentWpPageId":193760,"Slug":"how-substances-are-good-in-virtue-of-their-existence-without-being-substantial-goods","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/boethius-anicius-manlius-severinus-boethius/how-substances-are-good-in-virtue-of-their-existence-without-being-substantial-goods/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/boethius-anicius-manlius-severinus-boethius/how-substances-are-good-in-virtue-of-their-existence-without-being-substantial-goods/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69325,"CleanHtmlLength":16071,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"How Substances Are Good in Virtue of Their Existence Without Being Substantial Goods","Deck":"Boethius argues about participation, goodness, created substances, and the distinction between being good and being goodness itself.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Boethius","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/boethius-anicius-manlius-severinus-boethius/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Boethius","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/boethius-anicius-manlius-severinus-boethius/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/boethius-01-medieval-miniature-detail.jpg","ImageAlt":"Boethius, Detail from a Medieval Miniature","FilterTerra":"Eastern Mediterranean","ClickText":"Boethius","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/boethius-anicius-manlius-severinus-boethius/","Copies":["480 CE – 524 CE","Rome","late antique Roman philosopher, statesman, translator, and Christian theologian from Rome whose logical translations and commentaries, theory of universals, account of providence, eternity, free will, participation, and philosophical consolation transmitted Greek philosophy to the medieval Latin West."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:1","Title":"Ancient History","DateText":"3000 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:3","Title":"Classical Antiquity","DateText":"500 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/philosophers-of-classical-antiquity/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"522 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed year is a researched proxy/order year within Boethius\u0027 major authenticated corpus unless a source gives a firmer composition or publication anchor.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:6"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:ITA:2"}],"OriginalTitle":"Quomodo substantiae in eo quod sint bonae sint cum non sint substantialia bona","Language":"Latin","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:metaphysics"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:ethics"}],"Tradition":"Late antique Latin philosophy, Aristotelian logic, Neoplatonic metaphysics, Roman Christian theology, quadrivial education, and medieval Latin scholastic transmission","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Boethius argues about participation, goodness, created substances, and the distinction between being good and being goodness itself."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"De hebdomadibus; How Substances Are Good","KeyConcepts":"How Substances Are Good in Virtue of Their Existence Without Being Substantial Goods; Boethius; late antique logic; Aristotle; Porphyry; universals; providence; eternity; free will; participation; quadrivium; Latin scholastic transmission","Methodology":"Translation and commentary, logical analysis, scholastic classification, mathematical exposition, theological argument, Neoplatonic metaphysics, and prison dialogue.","Structure":"Accepted work page for Boethius under the Major Authenticated scope; pure translation-only pages, lost or spurious geometry texts, De definitione, source/testimony pages, modern editions, and works merely about Boethius are excluded."},"Arguments":["Connects Boethian logic, mathematical order, participation, predication, divine eternity, providence, free choice, consolation, and the transmission of Greek philosophy into the Latin West."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Plato, Aristotle, Porphyry, Cicero, Nicomachus, Augustine, Greek logical commentary, Neoplatonism, and Roman Christian theological debate.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Part of the major Boethian corpus that transmitted Greek logic, mathematical learning, theological analysis, and philosophical consolation to medieval Latin readers.","Used in work on universals, modality, providence and freedom, eternity, logic, philosophical therapy, medieval curriculum, and the continuity between late antique and medieval thought."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as De hebdomadibus, one of the most influential Boethian metaphysical-theological treatises."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Boethius argues about participation, goodness, created substances, and the distinction between being good and being goodness itself."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"De hebdomadibus; How Substances Are Good"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"How Substances Are Good in Virtue of Their Existence Without Being Substantial Goods; Boethius; late antique logic; Aristotle; Porphyry; universals; providence; eternity; free will; participation; quadrivium; Latin scholastic transmission"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Translation and commentary, logical analysis, scholastic classification, mathematical exposition, theological argument, Neoplatonic metaphysics, and prison dialogue."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"Accepted work page for Boethius under the Major Authenticated scope; pure translation-only pages, lost or spurious geometry texts, De definitione, source/testimony pages, modern editions, and works merely about Boethius are excluded."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Connects Boethian logic, mathematical order, participation, predication, divine eternity, providence, free choice, consolation, and the transmission of Greek philosophy into the Latin West."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Plato, Aristotle, Porphyry, Cicero, Nicomachus, Augustine, Greek logical commentary, Neoplatonism, and Roman Christian theological debate."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Alcuin, John Scotus Eriugena, Anselm of Canterbury, Peter Abelard, Thomas Aquinas, Dante, medieval Latin logic, scholastic theology, and the quadrivium curriculum."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Part of the major Boethian corpus that transmitted Greek logic, mathematical learning, theological analysis, and philosophical consolation to medieval Latin readers.","Used in work on universals, modality, providence and freedom, eternity, logic, philosophical therapy, medieval curriculum, and the continuity between late antique and medieval thought."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as De hebdomadibus, one of the most influential Boethian metaphysical-theological treatises."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}