A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God
{"WorkMasterId":5359,"WpPageId":259442,"ParentWpPageId":193820,"Slug":"a-neglected-argument-for-the-reality-of-god","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/charles-sanders-peirce/a-neglected-argument-for-the-reality-of-god/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/charles-sanders-peirce/a-neglected-argument-for-the-reality-of-god/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":68937,"CleanHtmlLength":15683,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God","Deck":"Peirce presents the musement-based neglected argument, joining instinctive reflection, inquiry, signs, and the reality of God.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Charles Sanders Peirce","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/charles-sanders-peirce/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Charles Sanders Peirce","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/charles-sanders-peirce/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/charles-sanders-peirce-01-formal-portrait-1.jpg","ImageAlt":"Charles Sanders Peirce formal portrait","FilterTerra":"North America","ClickText":"Charles Sanders Peirce","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/charles-sanders-peirce/","Copies":["1839 CE – 1914 CE","Cambridge, Massachusetts","American logician, scientist, and founder of pragmaticism whose work joined the pragmatic maxim, semiotic theory, fallibilism, abduction, probability, categories, scientific method, and evolutionary metaphysics."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:4","Title":"Modern History","DateText":"1800 CE – 1944 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-modern-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:11","Title":"Long 19th Century","DateText":"1870 CE – 1913 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-modern-history/philosophers-of-the-long-19th-century/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1908 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed year is the 1908 publication year.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:6"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:25"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:USA:6"}],"OriginalTitle":"","Language":"English","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-religion"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:metaphysics"}],"Tradition":"American pragmatism, pragmaticism, semiotic realism, mathematical logic, scientific inquiry, fallibilism, and evolutionary metaphysics","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Peirce presents the musement-based neglected argument, joining instinctive reflection, inquiry, signs, and the reality of God."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"","KeyConcepts":"A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God; Charles Sanders Peirce; pragmatism; pragmaticism; semiotic; signs; inquiry; abduction; induction; deduction; categories; realism; fallibilism; scientific method","Methodology":"Logical analysis, mathematical notation, semiotic analysis, scientific method, phenomenological categories, abductive reasoning, probabilistic inference, and manuscript-based argument.","Structure":"Accepted direct Peirce work page; edited collections, collected papers, source catalogues, testimonia, later anthologies, and scholarship about Peirce are excluded from direct work rows."},"Arguments":["Connects Peirce\u0027s work in logic, signs, categories, probability, inquiry, scientific method, metaphysics, mind, religion, and pragmaticism."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Kant, Duns Scotus, Aristotle, George Boole, Augustus De Morgan, Charles Darwin, Benjamin Peirce, William Whewell, and scientific practice.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Part of the direct Peirce corpus that made him central to logic, pragmatism, semiotics, scientific method, and the history of American philosophy.","Used in debates about inquiry, meaning, scientific method, truth, signs, diagrams, inference to the best explanation, probability, realism, and community-based knowledge."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct late Peirce essay in philosophy of religion."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Peirce presents the musement-based neglected argument, joining instinctive reflection, inquiry, signs, and the reality of God."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":""},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God; Charles Sanders Peirce; pragmatism; pragmaticism; semiotic; signs; inquiry; abduction; induction; deduction; categories; realism; fallibilism; scientific method"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Logical analysis, mathematical notation, semiotic analysis, scientific method, phenomenological categories, abductive reasoning, probabilistic inference, and manuscript-based argument."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"Accepted direct Peirce work page; edited collections, collected papers, source catalogues, testimonia, later anthologies, and scholarship about Peirce are excluded from direct work rows."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Connects Peirce\u0027s work in logic, signs, categories, probability, inquiry, scientific method, metaphysics, mind, religion, and pragmaticism."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Kant, Duns Scotus, Aristotle, George Boole, Augustus De Morgan, Charles Darwin, Benjamin Peirce, William Whewell, and scientific practice."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"American pragmatism, semiotics, mathematical logic, philosophy of science, abductive reasoning, fallibilism, process metaphysics, analytic philosophy, and inquiry-centered epistemology."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Part of the direct Peirce corpus that made him central to logic, pragmatism, semiotics, scientific method, and the history of American philosophy.","Used in debates about inquiry, meaning, scientific method, truth, signs, diagrams, inference to the best explanation, probability, realism, and community-based knowledge."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct late Peirce essay in philosophy of religion."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}