Xu yan
{"WorkMasterId":5497,"WpPageId":262694,"ParentWpPageId":193925,"Slug":"xu-yan","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/dai-zhen/xu-yan/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/dai-zhen/xu-yan/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":68649,"CleanHtmlLength":15395,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Xu yan","Deck":"Dai sets out methodological remarks about learning, textual evidence, and careful language, linking knowledge to disciplined investigation rather than inherited formulae.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Dai Zhen","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/dai-zhen/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Dai Zhen","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/dai-zhen/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/dai-zhen-01-iep-seated-portrait.jpg","ImageAlt":"Seated portrait of Dai Zhen","FilterTerra":"China (East Asia)","ClickText":"Dai Zhen","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/dai-zhen/","Copies":["1724 CE – 1777 CE","Xiuning, Anhui","Qing Confucian evidential scholar from Xiuning whose work joined philology, moral psychology, language, desire, principle, and precise inquiry against empty abstraction."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:3","Title":"Early Modern History","DateText":"1500 CE – 1799 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-early-modern-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:9","Title":"Enlightenment and Proto-Industrial","DateText":"1700 CE – 1799 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-early-modern-history/philosophers-of-the-enlightenment-and-proto-industrial/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1760 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed year is a proxy ordering date for profile ordering only; no exact composition date is asserted without source-backed evidence.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:10"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:41"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:CHN:10"}],"OriginalTitle":"緒言","Language":"Classical Chinese","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:epistemology"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-language"}],"Tradition":"Qing Confucian evidential learning","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Dai sets out methodological remarks about learning, textual evidence, and careful language, linking knowledge to disciplined investigation rather than inherited formulae."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Introductory Remarks; Xuyan","KeyConcepts":"method; evidence; learning; language; classical study; kaozheng; inquiry; semantic precision","Methodology":"Evidential philology, close reading of classical terms, moral psychology, semantic analysis, historical scholarship, and critique of abstract Cheng-Zhu metaphysical vocabulary.","Structure":"The public page presents received titles, alternate titles, proxy or source-backed ordering dates, philosophical focus, transmission/evidence notes, and no fake full-text badge."},"Arguments":["Dai sets out methodological remarks about learning, textual evidence, and careful language, linking knowledge to disciplined investigation rather than inherited formulae."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Mencius, the Confucian classics, Han learning, Qing kaozheng scholarship, Zhu Xi as a critical target, and classical semantics.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct work for Dai\u0027s method because the update treats his philological and epistemic procedure as part of his philosophical contribution.","The work matters because it connects textual evidence, ordinary human desires, moral feeling, and the meaning of classical terms without reducing ethics to empty abstraction."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct work for Dai\u0027s method because the update treats his philological and epistemic procedure as part of his philosophical contribution."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Dai sets out methodological remarks about learning, textual evidence, and careful language, linking knowledge to disciplined investigation rather than inherited formulae."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Introductory Remarks; Xuyan"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"method; evidence; learning; language; classical study; kaozheng; inquiry; semantic precision"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Evidential philology, close reading of classical terms, moral psychology, semantic analysis, historical scholarship, and critique of abstract Cheng-Zhu metaphysical vocabulary."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"The public page presents received titles, alternate titles, proxy or source-backed ordering dates, philosophical focus, transmission/evidence notes, and no fake full-text badge."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Dai sets out methodological remarks about learning, textual evidence, and careful language, linking knowledge to disciplined investigation rather than inherited formulae."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Mencius, the Confucian classics, Han learning, Qing kaozheng scholarship, Zhu Xi as a critical target, and classical semantics."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Qing evidential scholarship, later Chinese philology, modern interpretations of desire and principle, Hu Shi, twentieth-century Chinese philosophy, and studies of Confucian moral psychology."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct work for Dai\u0027s method because the update treats his philological and epistemic procedure as part of his philosophical contribution.","The work matters because it connects textual evidence, ordinary human desires, moral feeling, and the meaning of classical terms without reducing ethics to empty abstraction."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct work for Dai\u0027s method because the update treats his philological and epistemic procedure as part of his philosophical contribution."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}