Letter to Herodotus
{"WorkMasterId":5677,"WpPageId":269948,"ParentWpPageId":193732,"Slug":"letter-to-herodotus","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/epicurus-of-samos/letter-to-herodotus/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/epicurus-of-samos/letter-to-herodotus/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":68898,"CleanHtmlLength":15644,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Letter to Herodotus","Deck":"The Letter to Herodotus condenses Epicurus\u0027 atomist physics, explaining bodies, void, worlds, motion, soul, perception, and natural phenomena without providential design.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Epicurus of Samos","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/epicurus-of-samos/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Epicurus of Samos","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/epicurus-of-samos/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/epicurus-of-samos-01-met-marble-head-of-epikouros.jpg","ImageAlt":"Marble head of Epikouros","FilterTerra":"Eastern Mediterranean","ClickText":"Epicurus of Samos","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/epicurus-of-samos/","Copies":["341 BCE – 270 BCE","Samos","Greek philosopher from Samos whose Garden school joined atomist physics, a canon of sensation and feeling, and an ethics of pleasure understood as freedom from bodily pain and mental disturbance."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:1","Title":"Ancient History","DateText":"3000 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:3","Title":"Classical Antiquity","DateText":"500 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/philosophers-of-classical-antiquity/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"300 BCE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Proxy ordering year 300 BCE. Transmitted by Diogenes Laertius Book X as a summary letter; HasFullText remains false.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:8"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:GRC:2"}],"OriginalTitle":"Πρὸς Ἡρόδοτον","Language":"Ancient Greek","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:metaphysics"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-science"}],"Tradition":"Epicureanism","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["The Letter to Herodotus condenses Epicurus\u0027 atomist physics, explaining bodies, void, worlds, motion, soul, perception, and natural phenomena without providential design."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Epistle to Herodotus; Letter on Physics","KeyConcepts":"Atoms; void; pleasure; ataraxia; aponia; canon; sensation; preconceptions; feelings; death; gods; friendship; justice; Garden; natural desire; vain desire","Methodology":"Concise doctrinal summary, atomist natural explanation, canonics, ethical therapy, theological demystification, maxim collection, ancient testimony, and fragmentary papyrus transmission.","Structure":"The page records a transmitted Epicurean work or work-group with visible letter, collection, digest, or fragmentary status and no imported full-text badge."},"Arguments":["The Letter to Herodotus condenses Epicurus\u0027 atomist physics, explaining bodies, void, worlds, motion, soul, perception, and natural phenomena without providential design."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Democritus, Nausiphanes, Cyrenaic ethics, Pyrrhonian context, Plato and Academy context, and Hellenistic debates about nature and the good.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Included as one of the six transmitted or fragmentary Epicurus work pages approved for the full-process update.","The work remains central to debates about naturalism, fear of death, pleasure, desire, friendship, political obligation, religious fear, and philosophical therapy."],"EvidenceNote":["Direct work page approved in the Epicurus update. Diogenes Laertius biography, Lucretius, Philodemus, Usener Epicurea, modern readers, quote books, individual On Nature books, fragment collections, catalog rows, and scholarship remain evidence/Other Voices unless separately approved."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["The Letter to Herodotus condenses Epicurus\u0027 atomist physics, explaining bodies, void, worlds, motion, soul, perception, and natural phenomena without providential design."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Epistle to Herodotus; Letter on Physics"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"Atoms; void; pleasure; ataraxia; aponia; canon; sensation; preconceptions; feelings; death; gods; friendship; justice; Garden; natural desire; vain desire"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Concise doctrinal summary, atomist natural explanation, canonics, ethical therapy, theological demystification, maxim collection, ancient testimony, and fragmentary papyrus transmission."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"The page records a transmitted Epicurean work or work-group with visible letter, collection, digest, or fragmentary status and no imported full-text badge."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["The Letter to Herodotus condenses Epicurus\u0027 atomist physics, explaining bodies, void, worlds, motion, soul, perception, and natural phenomena without providential design."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Democritus, Nausiphanes, Cyrenaic ethics, Pyrrhonian context, Plato and Academy context, and Hellenistic debates about nature and the good."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Metrodorus, Hermarchus, Lucretius, Philodemus, Diogenes of Oenoanda, Gassendi, early modern atomism, utilitarian debates, and modern Epicurean scholarship."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Included as one of the six transmitted or fragmentary Epicurus work pages approved for the full-process update.","The work remains central to debates about naturalism, fear of death, pleasure, desire, friendship, political obligation, religious fear, and philosophical therapy."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Direct work page approved in the Epicurus update. Diogenes Laertius biography, Lucretius, Philodemus, Usener Epicurea, modern readers, quote books, individual On Nature books, fragment collections, catalog rows, and scholarship remain evidence/Other Voices unless separately approved."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}