Correspondence concerning Empedocles / Against Empedocles
{"WorkMasterId":5965,"WpPageId":276796,"ParentWpPageId":193734,"Slug":"against-empedocles","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/hermarchus-of-mytilene/against-empedocles/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/hermarchus-of-mytilene/against-empedocles/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69508,"CleanHtmlLength":16254,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Correspondence concerning Empedocles / Against Empedocles","Deck":"Hermarchus used Epicurean naturalism and polemic against Empedoclean explanations to discuss nature, animals, law, justice, and the conditions under which human communities regulate violence.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Hermarchus of Mytilene","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/hermarchus-of-mytilene/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Hermarchus of Mytilene","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/hermarchus-of-mytilene/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/hermarchus-of-mytilene-01-roman-marble-bust-of-hermarchus.jpg","ImageAlt":"Hermarchus marble bust, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek","FilterTerra":"Eastern Mediterranean","ClickText":"Hermarchus of Mytilene","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/hermarchus-of-mytilene/","Copies":["325 BCE – 250 BCE","Mytilene, Lesbos","Epicurean scholarch from Mytilene, pupil and successor of Epicurus, whose lost works and fragments preserve early Garden arguments on nature, law, justice, mathematics, rival schools, and the critique of fear-based religion."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:1","Title":"Ancient History","DateText":"3000 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:3","Title":"Classical Antiquity","DateText":"500 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/philosophers-of-classical-antiquity/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"275 BCE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Site-normalized composition estimate: 275 BCE. Ancient notices and Porphyry/Obbink scholarship preserve the work-cluster evidence.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:8"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:GRC:2"}],"OriginalTitle":"Pros Empedoklea","Language":"Ancient Greek","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-science"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:political-philosophy"}],"Tradition":"Epicureanism, Hellenistic Greek philosophy, ancient atomism, and Garden scholarch tradition","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Hermarchus used Epicurean naturalism and polemic against Empedoclean explanations to discuss nature, animals, law, justice, and the conditions under which human communities regulate violence."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Against Empedocles; On Empedocles; Correspondence concerning Empedocles; twenty-two letters on Empedocles","KeyConcepts":"Empedocles; animals; law; justice; naturalism; Epicurean physics; polemic; Porphyry; social contract; survival; anti-teleology","Methodology":"Epicurean polemic, doxographical argument, philosophical correspondence, natural explanation, ethical-political reasoning, and fragmentary testimony. No full text is imported in this pass.","Structure":"One lost or fragmentary work-cluster page for the attested title. Individual fragments, testimonia, and public-domain source texts are held for later corpus expansion."},"Arguments":["Hermarchus used Epicurean naturalism and polemic against Empedoclean explanations to discuss nature, animals, law, justice, and the conditions under which human communities regulate violence."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Epicurus of Samos, Metrodorus of Lampsacus, early Garden teaching, ancient atomism, anti-teleological natural philosophy, and debates with Empedoclean, Platonic, Aristotelian, Stoic, and Peripatetic traditions.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct lost work because Diogenes Laertius lists Hermarchus\u0027 twenty-two letters on Empedocles and Cambridge/Porphyry scholarship treats Against Empedocles as the source of important fragments.","Hermarchus remains important for reconstructing early Epicurean legal theory, naturalism, anti-teleology, theology, language and science debates, and the institutional succession after Epicurus."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct lost work because Diogenes Laertius lists Hermarchus\u0027 twenty-two letters on Empedocles and Cambridge/Porphyry scholarship treats Against Empedocles as the source of important fragments."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Hermarchus used Epicurean naturalism and polemic against Empedoclean explanations to discuss nature, animals, law, justice, and the conditions under which human communities regulate violence."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Against Empedocles; On Empedocles; Correspondence concerning Empedocles; twenty-two letters on Empedocles"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"Empedocles; animals; law; justice; naturalism; Epicurean physics; polemic; Porphyry; social contract; survival; anti-teleology"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Epicurean polemic, doxographical argument, philosophical correspondence, natural explanation, ethical-political reasoning, and fragmentary testimony. No full text is imported in this pass."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"One lost or fragmentary work-cluster page for the attested title. Individual fragments, testimonia, and public-domain source texts are held for later corpus expansion."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Hermarchus used Epicurean naturalism and polemic against Empedoclean explanations to discuss nature, animals, law, justice, and the conditions under which human communities regulate violence."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Epicurus of Samos, Metrodorus of Lampsacus, early Garden teaching, ancient atomism, anti-teleological natural philosophy, and debates with Empedoclean, Platonic, Aristotelian, Stoic, and Peripatetic traditions."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Epicurean scholarch succession, later Epicurean discussions of justice and law, Lucretian and Philodemean reception, Hellenistic polemic against rival schools, and modern reconstruction of early Garden philosophy."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct lost work because Diogenes Laertius lists Hermarchus\u0027 twenty-two letters on Empedocles and Cambridge/Porphyry scholarship treats Against Empedocles as the source of important fragments.","Hermarchus remains important for reconstructing early Epicurean legal theory, naturalism, anti-teleology, theology, language and science debates, and the institutional succession after Epicurus."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct lost work because Diogenes Laertius lists Hermarchus\u0027 twenty-two letters on Empedocles and Cambridge/Porphyry scholarship treats Against Empedocles as the source of important fragments."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}