Noah’s Moral Ark
{"WorkMasterId":5985,"WpPageId":276989,"ParentWpPageId":193771,"Slug":"noahs-moral-ark","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/hugh-of-st-victor/noahs-moral-ark/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/hugh-of-st-victor/noahs-moral-ark/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69200,"CleanHtmlLength":15946,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Noah\u0027s Moral Ark","Deck":"Hugh uses Noah\u0027s ark as a moral and psychological image of spiritual formation, memory, order, and the ascent of the soul.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Hugh of St. Victor","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/hugh-of-st-victor/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Hugh of St. Victor","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/hugh-of-st-victor/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/hugh-of-st-victor-01-hugh-of-saint-victor.jpg","ImageAlt":"Hugh of Saint Victor teaching in his monastic school","FilterTerra":"Western Europe","ClickText":"Hugh of St. Victor","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/hugh-of-st-victor/","Copies":["1096 CE – 1141 CE","Saxony, probably the Harz/Hamersleben region","Saxon-born Victorine philosopher and theologian whose Didascalicon, De sacramentis, ark imagery, arts curriculum, symbolic exegesis, and contemplative psychology joined learning to spiritual restoration."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:2","Title":"Medieval History","DateText":"500 CE – 1499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:5","Title":"High Medieval","DateText":"1000 CE – 1299 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/philosophers-of-high-medieval/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1127 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Usually grouped with the ark treatises of about 1125-1130; public page uses 1127 as an ordering date.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:3"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:DEU:1"}],"OriginalTitle":"De arca Noe morali","Language":"Latin","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:ethics"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-mind"}],"Tradition":"Victorine Augustinian theology, early scholastic philosophy, mystical theology, liberal and mechanical arts, exegesis, sacramental theology, and symbolic pedagogy","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Hugh uses Noah\u0027s ark as a moral and psychological image of spiritual formation, memory, order, and the ascent of the soul."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Noah\u0027s Moral Ark; On the Moral Interpretation of the Ark of Noah; De arca Noe morali","KeyConcepts":"Noah; ark; virtue; memory; soul; moral formation; contemplation; restoration; allegory; tropology; discipline","Methodology":"Scholastic classification, Augustinian pedagogy, literal and spiritual exegesis, symbolic diagram, contemplative psychology, dialectical theology, arts curriculum, and manuscript transmission. No full text is imported.","Structure":"Direct work-cluster page with Latin title, English title, date note, disciplinary focus, and evidence note. Public text surfaces, catalogs, and manuscripts remain source evidence only."},"Arguments":["Hugh uses Noah\u0027s ark as a moral and psychological image of spiritual formation, memory, order, and the ascent of the soul."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Augustine, Boethius, Pseudo-Dionysius, the liberal arts tradition, biblical exegesis, William of Champeaux, the Abbey of Saint-Victor, monastic pedagogy, and early twelfth-century scholastic debate.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct ark treatise because Wikisource, Encyclopedia.com, Wikipedia, Oxford, and Mystic Ark scholarship identify it as a major Hugh work.","The work remains useful for education, classification of knowledge, religious epistemology, philosophy of language, symbolic interpretation, contemplation, arts and technology, and the relation between philosophy and theology."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct ark treatise because Wikisource, Encyclopedia.com, Wikipedia, Oxford, and Mystic Ark scholarship identify it as a major Hugh work."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Hugh uses Noah\u0027s ark as a moral and psychological image of spiritual formation, memory, order, and the ascent of the soul."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Noah\u0027s Moral Ark; On the Moral Interpretation of the Ark of Noah; De arca Noe morali"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"Noah; ark; virtue; memory; soul; moral formation; contemplation; restoration; allegory; tropology; discipline"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Scholastic classification, Augustinian pedagogy, literal and spiritual exegesis, symbolic diagram, contemplative psychology, dialectical theology, arts curriculum, and manuscript transmission. No full text is imported."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"Direct work-cluster page with Latin title, English title, date note, disciplinary focus, and evidence note. Public text surfaces, catalogs, and manuscripts remain source evidence only."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Hugh uses Noah\u0027s ark as a moral and psychological image of spiritual formation, memory, order, and the ascent of the soul."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Augustine, Boethius, Pseudo-Dionysius, the liberal arts tradition, biblical exegesis, William of Champeaux, the Abbey of Saint-Victor, monastic pedagogy, and early twelfth-century scholastic debate."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Victorine theology, Richard of Saint Victor, Godfrey of Saint Victor, Bonaventure, scholastic curriculum, medieval exegesis, sacramental theology, mystical theology, liberal arts classification, mechanical arts, and later histories of medieval education."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct ark treatise because Wikisource, Encyclopedia.com, Wikipedia, Oxford, and Mystic Ark scholarship identify it as a major Hugh work.","The work remains useful for education, classification of knowledge, religious epistemology, philosophy of language, symbolic interpretation, contemplation, arts and technology, and the relation between philosophy and theology."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct ark treatise because Wikisource, Encyclopedia.com, Wikipedia, Oxford, and Mystic Ark scholarship identify it as a major Hugh work."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}