Huizi / Master Hui
{"WorkMasterId":5997,"WpPageId":277033,"ParentWpPageId":193897,"Slug":"huizi-master-hui","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/hui-shi/huizi-master-hui/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/hui-shi/huizi-master-hui/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69377,"CleanHtmlLength":16123,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Huizi / Master Hui","Deck":"The lost Huizi work cluster gathers the tradition that Hui Shi was a prolific disputer whose writings or library were remembered as vast even though no independent text survives.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Hui Shi","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/hui-shi/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Hui Shi","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/hui-shi/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/hui-shi-01-kano-tanyu-huizi-at-apricot-altar.jpg","ImageAlt":"Kano Tan\u0027yu, Huizi at the Apricot Altar","FilterTerra":"China (East Asia)","ClickText":"Hui Shi","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/hui-shi/","Copies":["380 BCE – 305 BCE","State of Song, probably the Shangqiu/Henan region","Warring States Chinese School of Names philosopher, disputer, and statesman whose lost Huizi tradition, Ten Theses, law-code story, and Zhuangzi dialogues shaped later debates about names, actualities, identity, difference, space, time, perspective, and public standards."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:1","Title":"Ancient History","DateText":"3000 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:2","Title":"Iron Age","DateText":"1200 BCE – 501 BCE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/philosophers-of-the-iron-age/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"305 BCE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed proxy date uses 305 BCE, Hui Shi\u0027s retained death date, because the underlying writings are lost and survive only through later reports.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:10"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:41"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:CHN:10"}],"OriginalTitle":"惠子","Language":"Classical Chinese","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-language"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:logic"}],"Tradition":"School of Names / Mingjia, Warring States disputation, Zhuangzi reception, names and actualities, and early Chinese logic","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["The lost Huizi work cluster gathers the tradition that Hui Shi was a prolific disputer whose writings or library were remembered as vast even though no independent text survives."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Huizi; Master Hui; Hui Shi writings; Hui Tzu; Hui Shih; five carts of books","KeyConcepts":"Huizi; Hui Shi; Master Hui; five carts; School of Names; names; actualities; disputation; paradox; Zhuangzi; Warring States; language; logic; reception","Methodology":"Lost or fragmentary work-cluster record based on received reports, Zhuangzi Tianxia testimony, Warring States anecdotes, comparative School of Names evidence, and later bibliographic reception. No full text is imported.","Structure":"Direct lost or fragmentary work-cluster page with Classical Chinese title, English title, date note, disciplinary focus, and evidence note. Primary text surfaces and public scans remain evidence only."},"Arguments":["The lost Huizi work cluster gathers the tradition that Hui Shi was a prolific disputer whose writings or library were remembered as vast even though no independent text survives."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Warring States disputation, Mohist concern with names and standards, early Chinese political persuasion, Zhuangzi dialogue tradition, and debates over names, actualities, sameness, difference, space, time, and the ten thousand things.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct lost work-cluster because SEP, Zhuangzi Tianxia, Han bibliographic testimony, ChinaKnowledge, Encyclopedia.com, and modern scholarship all preserve a Huizi/Hui Shi textual tradition while warning that the independent work is lost.","The work cluster remains important for comparative logic, metaphysics, language, space, time, identity, difference, perspective, public standards, political persuasion, and the limits of disputation."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct lost work-cluster because SEP, Zhuangzi Tianxia, Han bibliographic testimony, ChinaKnowledge, Encyclopedia.com, and modern scholarship all preserve a Huizi/Hui Shi textual tradition while warning that the independent work is lost."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["The lost Huizi work cluster gathers the tradition that Hui Shi was a prolific disputer whose writings or library were remembered as vast even though no independent text survives."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Huizi; Master Hui; Hui Shi writings; Hui Tzu; Hui Shih; five carts of books"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"Huizi; Hui Shi; Master Hui; five carts; School of Names; names; actualities; disputation; paradox; Zhuangzi; Warring States; language; logic; reception"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Lost or fragmentary work-cluster record based on received reports, Zhuangzi Tianxia testimony, Warring States anecdotes, comparative School of Names evidence, and later bibliographic reception. No full text is imported."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"Direct lost or fragmentary work-cluster page with Classical Chinese title, English title, date note, disciplinary focus, and evidence note. Primary text surfaces and public scans remain evidence only."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["The lost Huizi work cluster gathers the tradition that Hui Shi was a prolific disputer whose writings or library were remembered as vast even though no independent text survives."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Warring States disputation, Mohist concern with names and standards, early Chinese political persuasion, Zhuangzi dialogue tradition, and debates over names, actualities, sameness, difference, space, time, and the ten thousand things."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"School of Names reception, Gongsun Long, Zhuangzi debates, Xunzi criticism of disputers, Han bibliographic taxonomy, Chinese logic, comparative philosophy of language, and modern interpretations of identity and difference."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct lost work-cluster because SEP, Zhuangzi Tianxia, Han bibliographic testimony, ChinaKnowledge, Encyclopedia.com, and modern scholarship all preserve a Huizi/Hui Shi textual tradition while warning that the independent work is lost.","The work cluster remains important for comparative logic, metaphysics, language, space, time, identity, difference, perspective, public standards, political persuasion, and the limits of disputation."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct lost work-cluster because SEP, Zhuangzi Tianxia, Han bibliographic testimony, ChinaKnowledge, Encyclopedia.com, and modern scholarship all preserve a Huizi/Hui Shi textual tradition while warning that the independent work is lost."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}