Faxing lun / Treatise on Dharma-Nature
{"WorkMasterId":6004,"WpPageId":277304,"ParentWpPageId":193908,"Slug":"treatise-on-dharma-nature","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/huiyuan/treatise-on-dharma-nature/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/huiyuan/treatise-on-dharma-nature/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69666,"CleanHtmlLength":16412,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Faxing lun / Treatise on Dharma-Nature","Deck":"The treatise is remembered for Huiyuan\u0027s account of dharma-nature and ultimate reality, with later reports saying Kumārajīva praised its insight despite its fragmentary or lost status.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Huiyuan","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/huiyuan/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Huiyuan","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/huiyuan/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/huiyuan-01-wanxiaotang-hui-yuan-portrait.jpg","ImageAlt":"Wanxiaotang portrait of Huiyuan","FilterTerra":"China (East Asia)","ClickText":"Huiyuan","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/huiyuan/","Copies":["334 CE – 416 CE","Loufan, Yanmen Commandery, Bingzhou, near modern Ningwu County, Shanxi","Eastern Jin Chinese Buddhist scholastic monk associated with Mount Lu, Donglin Temple, early Chinese Pure Land devotion, Prajnaparamita interpretation, karmic retribution, monastic autonomy from royal ritual, and the correspondence with Kumārajīva."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:1","Title":"Ancient History","DateText":"3000 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:3","Title":"Classical Antiquity","DateText":"500 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/philosophers-of-classical-antiquity/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"406 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 406 CE because the work is tied to Huiyuan\u0027s mature Mount Lu Mahayana metaphysics after Kumārajīva\u0027s early fifth-century translation activity.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:10"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:41"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:CHN:10"}],"OriginalTitle":"法性論","Language":"Classical Chinese","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:metaphysics"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:epistemology"}],"Tradition":"Eastern Jin Chinese Buddhism, Mount Lu scholastic monasticism, early Pure Land devotion, Prajnaparamita interpretation, Abhidharma reception, karma and rebirth, monastic autonomy, and correspondence with Kumārajīva","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["The treatise is remembered for Huiyuan\u0027s account of dharma-nature and ultimate reality, with later reports saying Kumārajīva praised its insight despite its fragmentary or lost status."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Faxing lun; Treatise on Dharma-Nature; On Dharma-Nature","KeyConcepts":"dharma-nature;法性; ultimate reality; nirvana; emptiness; Prajnaparamita; Kumārajīva; lost treatise; Chinese Buddhist metaphysics","Methodology":"Direct work-cluster record based on reference entries, Chinese text surfaces, catalog records, and modern scholarship. Public Chinese text is evidence only and no full text is imported.","Structure":"One work-cluster page with Chinese title, English title, date note where available, doctrinal focus, and source evidence. Surviving fragments, prefaces, correspondence layers, and later textual witnesses are documented but not split into full-text pages."},"Arguments":["The treatise is remembered for Huiyuan\u0027s account of dharma-nature and ultimate reality, with later reports saying Kumārajīva praised its insight despite its fragmentary or lost status."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Daoan, Kumārajīva, Prajnaparamita literature, Abhidharma study, Daoist and Confucian learning, early Chinese Buddhism, Amitabha devotion, and Mount Lu contemplative practice.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct Huiyuan work because Chinese reference traditions and modern scholarship list Faxing lun among Huiyuan\u0027s writings while documenting its lost or fragmentary status.","The work remains relevant to Buddhist political philosophy, philosophy of religion, mind and personhood, karma, religious community, translation history, intercultural metaphysics, and the Chinese reception of Indian Buddhist categories."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct Huiyuan work because Chinese reference traditions and modern scholarship list Faxing lun among Huiyuan\u0027s writings while documenting its lost or fragmentary status."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["The treatise is remembered for Huiyuan\u0027s account of dharma-nature and ultimate reality, with later reports saying Kumārajīva praised its insight despite its fragmentary or lost status."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Faxing lun; Treatise on Dharma-Nature; On Dharma-Nature"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"dharma-nature;法性; ultimate reality; nirvana; emptiness; Prajnaparamita; Kumārajīva; lost treatise; Chinese Buddhist metaphysics"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Direct work-cluster record based on reference entries, Chinese text surfaces, catalog records, and modern scholarship. Public Chinese text is evidence only and no full text is imported."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"One work-cluster page with Chinese title, English title, date note where available, doctrinal focus, and source evidence. Surviving fragments, prefaces, correspondence layers, and later textual witnesses are documented but not split into full-text pages."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["The treatise is remembered for Huiyuan\u0027s account of dharma-nature and ultimate reality, with later reports saying Kumārajīva praised its insight despite its fragmentary or lost status."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Daoan, Kumārajīva, Prajnaparamita literature, Abhidharma study, Daoist and Confucian learning, early Chinese Buddhism, Amitabha devotion, and Mount Lu contemplative practice."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Chinese Buddhist monastic autonomy, Pure Land devotional communities, Chinese Buddhist theories of karma and personhood, Mount Lu Buddhist scholarship, later Buddhist church-state argument, and East Asian receptions of the Tiger Brook and Lotus Society traditions."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Huiyuan work because Chinese reference traditions and modern scholarship list Faxing lun among Huiyuan\u0027s writings while documenting its lost or fragmentary status.","The work remains relevant to Buddhist political philosophy, philosophy of religion, mind and personhood, karma, religious community, translation history, intercultural metaphysics, and the Chinese reception of Indian Buddhist categories."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Huiyuan work because Chinese reference traditions and modern scholarship list Faxing lun among Huiyuan\u0027s writings while documenting its lost or fragmentary status."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}