Dacheng dayi zhang / Questions on the Meaning of the Mahayana
{"WorkMasterId":6005,"WpPageId":277305,"ParentWpPageId":193908,"Slug":"questions-on-meaning-of-mahayana","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/huiyuan/questions-on-meaning-of-mahayana/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/huiyuan/questions-on-meaning-of-mahayana/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69702,"CleanHtmlLength":16448,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Dacheng dayi zhang / Questions on the Meaning of the Mahayana","Deck":"The work preserves a doctrinal exchange in which Huiyuan questions Kumārajīva on major Mahayana problems of reality, knowledge, practice, and liberation.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Huiyuan","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/huiyuan/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Huiyuan","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/huiyuan/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/huiyuan-01-wanxiaotang-hui-yuan-portrait.jpg","ImageAlt":"Wanxiaotang portrait of Huiyuan","FilterTerra":"China (East Asia)","ClickText":"Huiyuan","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/huiyuan/","Copies":["334 CE – 416 CE","Loufan, Yanmen Commandery, Bingzhou, near modern Ningwu County, Shanxi","Eastern Jin Chinese Buddhist scholastic monk associated with Mount Lu, Donglin Temple, early Chinese Pure Land devotion, Prajnaparamita interpretation, karmic retribution, monastic autonomy from royal ritual, and the correspondence with Kumārajīva."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:1","Title":"Ancient History","DateText":"3000 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:3","Title":"Classical Antiquity","DateText":"500 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/philosophers-of-classical-antiquity/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"405 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 405 CE because the work-cluster belongs to the Huiyuan-Kumārajīva correspondence during Kumārajīva\u0027s Chang\u0027an translation period, not to any later medieval century.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:10"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:41"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:CHN:10"}],"OriginalTitle":"大乘大義章","Language":"Classical Chinese","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:epistemology"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:metaphysics"}],"Tradition":"Eastern Jin Chinese Buddhism, Mount Lu scholastic monasticism, early Pure Land devotion, Prajnaparamita interpretation, Abhidharma reception, karma and rebirth, monastic autonomy, and correspondence with Kumārajīva","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["The work preserves a doctrinal exchange in which Huiyuan questions Kumārajīva on major Mahayana problems of reality, knowledge, practice, and liberation."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Dacheng dayi zhang; Jiumoluoshi fashi dayi; Questions on the Meaning of the Mahayana; Kumārajīva-Huiyuan correspondence","KeyConcepts":"Mahayana; Kumārajīva; correspondence; dharmakaya; emptiness; practice; realization; doctrinal questions; Chinese Buddhist scholasticism","Methodology":"Direct work-cluster record based on reference entries, Chinese text surfaces, catalog records, and modern scholarship. Public Chinese text is evidence only and no full text is imported.","Structure":"One work-cluster page with Chinese title, English title, date note where available, doctrinal focus, and source evidence. Surviving fragments, prefaces, correspondence layers, and later textual witnesses are documented but not split into full-text pages."},"Arguments":["The work preserves a doctrinal exchange in which Huiyuan questions Kumārajīva on major Mahayana problems of reality, knowledge, practice, and liberation."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Daoan, Kumārajīva, Prajnaparamita literature, Abhidharma study, Daoist and Confucian learning, early Chinese Buddhism, Amitabha devotion, and Mount Lu contemplative practice.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct work-cluster because CiNii, NTU, Wikipedia, Open Library/WorldCat searches, and scholarship identify Dacheng dayi zhang as the Huiyuan-Kumārajīva questions and answers tradition.","The work remains relevant to Buddhist political philosophy, philosophy of religion, mind and personhood, karma, religious community, translation history, intercultural metaphysics, and the Chinese reception of Indian Buddhist categories."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct work-cluster because CiNii, NTU, Wikipedia, Open Library/WorldCat searches, and scholarship identify Dacheng dayi zhang as the Huiyuan-Kumārajīva questions and answers tradition."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["The work preserves a doctrinal exchange in which Huiyuan questions Kumārajīva on major Mahayana problems of reality, knowledge, practice, and liberation."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Dacheng dayi zhang; Jiumoluoshi fashi dayi; Questions on the Meaning of the Mahayana; Kumārajīva-Huiyuan correspondence"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"Mahayana; Kumārajīva; correspondence; dharmakaya; emptiness; practice; realization; doctrinal questions; Chinese Buddhist scholasticism"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Direct work-cluster record based on reference entries, Chinese text surfaces, catalog records, and modern scholarship. Public Chinese text is evidence only and no full text is imported."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"One work-cluster page with Chinese title, English title, date note where available, doctrinal focus, and source evidence. Surviving fragments, prefaces, correspondence layers, and later textual witnesses are documented but not split into full-text pages."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["The work preserves a doctrinal exchange in which Huiyuan questions Kumārajīva on major Mahayana problems of reality, knowledge, practice, and liberation."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Daoan, Kumārajīva, Prajnaparamita literature, Abhidharma study, Daoist and Confucian learning, early Chinese Buddhism, Amitabha devotion, and Mount Lu contemplative practice."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Chinese Buddhist monastic autonomy, Pure Land devotional communities, Chinese Buddhist theories of karma and personhood, Mount Lu Buddhist scholarship, later Buddhist church-state argument, and East Asian receptions of the Tiger Brook and Lotus Society traditions."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct work-cluster because CiNii, NTU, Wikipedia, Open Library/WorldCat searches, and scholarship identify Dacheng dayi zhang as the Huiyuan-Kumārajīva questions and answers tradition.","The work remains relevant to Buddhist political philosophy, philosophy of religion, mind and personhood, karma, religious community, translation history, intercultural metaphysics, and the Chinese reception of Indian Buddhist categories."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct work-cluster because CiNii, NTU, Wikipedia, Open Library/WorldCat searches, and scholarship identify Dacheng dayi zhang as the Huiyuan-Kumārajīva questions and answers tradition."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}