Commentary on Nicomachus’ Introduction to Arithmetic
{"WorkMasterId":6019,"WpPageId":277505,"ParentWpPageId":193751,"Slug":"commentary-on-nicomachus-introduction-to-arithmetic","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/commentary-on-nicomachus-introduction-to-arithmetic/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/commentary-on-nicomachus-introduction-to-arithmetic/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69461,"CleanHtmlLength":16207,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Commentary on Nicomachus\u0027 Introduction to Arithmetic","Deck":"The commentary interprets arithmetic as philosophical training, connecting number, classification, proportion, and metaphysical order.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Iamblichus of Chalcis","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Iamblichus of Chalcis","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/iamblichus-of-chalcis-05-tractatus-de-divinatione-magicis.jpg","ImageAlt":"Johann Theodor de Bry engraving of Iamblichus Chalcidensis","FilterTerra":"Eastern Mediterranean","ClickText":"Iamblichus of Chalcis","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/","Copies":["245 CE – 325 CE","Chalcis ad Belum, Coele-Syria, probably near modern Qinnasrin","Syrian Greek Neoplatonist of Chalcis whose theurgy, Pythagorean curriculum, Platonic commentary, mathematics, soul theory, metaphysics, and philosophy of religion shaped later Syrian and Athenian Neoplatonism."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:1","Title":"Ancient History","DateText":"3000 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:3","Title":"Classical Antiquity","DateText":"500 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/philosophers-of-classical-antiquity/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"305 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 305 CE because the commentary belongs to the same Iamblichean mathematical curriculum as On General Mathematical Science.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:10"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:SYR:2"}],"OriginalTitle":"Εἰς τὴν Νικομάχου ἀριθμητικὴν εἰσαγωγήν","Language":"Greek","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-science"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:metaphysics"}],"Tradition":"Late antique Syrian Neoplatonism; Pythagorean curriculum; Platonic commentary; theurgy","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["The commentary interprets arithmetic as philosophical training, connecting number, classification, proportion, and metaphysical order."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"In Nicomachi arithmeticam introductionem; Commentary on Nicomachus; In Nicomachi Arithmeticam","KeyConcepts":"Nicomachus; arithmetic; number theory; commentary; proportion; classification; mathematical ontology; Pythagorean science","Methodology":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP, reference entries, catalog records, manuscript/source pages, public-domain text surfaces, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported.","Structure":"One work-cluster page with Greek or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, and status note for lost, fragmentary, attributed, or transmitted materials."},"Arguments":["The commentary interprets arithmetic as philosophical training, connecting number, classification, proportion, and metaphysical order."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoras, Plotinus, Porphyry, Nicomachus of Gerasa, the Chaldean Oracles, late antique religious practice, and earlier Platonic commentary traditions.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct Iamblichus work because SEP and catalog/scholarship evidence treat it as an extant arithmetic commentary in the Pythagorean program.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, philosophy of religion, philosophy of language, mathematics, ritual theory, ancient psychology, commentary traditions, and the relation between philosophical reasoning and embodied religious practice."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct Iamblichus work because SEP and catalog/scholarship evidence treat it as an extant arithmetic commentary in the Pythagorean program."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["The commentary interprets arithmetic as philosophical training, connecting number, classification, proportion, and metaphysical order."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"In Nicomachi arithmeticam introductionem; Commentary on Nicomachus; In Nicomachi Arithmeticam"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"Nicomachus; arithmetic; number theory; commentary; proportion; classification; mathematical ontology; Pythagorean science"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP, reference entries, catalog records, manuscript/source pages, public-domain text surfaces, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"One work-cluster page with Greek or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, and status note for lost, fragmentary, attributed, or transmitted materials."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["The commentary interprets arithmetic as philosophical training, connecting number, classification, proportion, and metaphysical order."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoras, Plotinus, Porphyry, Nicomachus of Gerasa, the Chaldean Oracles, late antique religious practice, and earlier Platonic commentary traditions."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Syrian and Athenian Neoplatonism, Proclus, Damascius, Simplicius, late antique theurgy, Pythagorean curriculum studies, medieval and Renaissance Platonic ritual theory, and modern scholarship on philosophy, religion, mathematics, and the soul."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Iamblichus work because SEP and catalog/scholarship evidence treat it as an extant arithmetic commentary in the Pythagorean program.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, philosophy of religion, philosophy of language, mathematics, ritual theory, ancient psychology, commentary traditions, and the relation between philosophical reasoning and embodied religious practice."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Iamblichus work because SEP and catalog/scholarship evidence treat it as an extant arithmetic commentary in the Pythagorean program."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}