De mysteriis / On the Mysteries
{"WorkMasterId":6020,"WpPageId":277506,"ParentWpPageId":193751,"Slug":"on-the-mysteries","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/on-the-mysteries/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/on-the-mysteries/","HasFullText":true,"RawHtmlLength":70864,"CleanHtmlLength":17094,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"De mysteriis / On the Mysteries","Deck":"The work defends theurgy as a divinely grounded practice that exceeds discursive reasoning while preserving a metaphysical hierarchy of gods, souls, daimones, symbols, and ritual acts.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Iamblichus of Chalcis","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Iamblichus of Chalcis","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/iamblichus-of-chalcis-05-tractatus-de-divinatione-magicis.jpg","ImageAlt":"Johann Theodor de Bry engraving of Iamblichus Chalcidensis","FilterTerra":"Eastern Mediterranean","ClickText":"Iamblichus of Chalcis","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/","Copies":["245 CE – 325 CE","Chalcis ad Belum, Coele-Syria, probably near modern Qinnasrin","Syrian Greek Neoplatonist of Chalcis whose theurgy, Pythagorean curriculum, Platonic commentary, mathematics, soul theory, metaphysics, and philosophy of religion shaped later Syrian and Athenian Neoplatonism."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:1","Title":"Ancient History","DateText":"3000 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:3","Title":"Classical Antiquity","DateText":"500 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/philosophers-of-classical-antiquity/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"310 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 310 CE because the work responds to Porphyry and belongs to Iamblichus\u0027 mature theurgical period before the later lost commentaries.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:10"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:SYR:2"}],"OriginalTitle":"Περὶ τῶν Αἰγυπτίων μυστηρίων","Language":"Greek","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-religion"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:metaphysics"}],"Tradition":"Late antique Syrian Neoplatonism; Pythagorean curriculum; Platonic commentary; theurgy","FullText":{"Title":"Full Text","Copy":"Full text is available on a separate page for readability.","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/on-the-mysteries/full-text/","Label":"Full Text","Kicker":"Open full text","Cards":[{"Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/on-the-mysteries/full-text/","Label":"Full Text","Kicker":"Open full text"}]},"CoreThesis":["The work defends theurgy as a divinely grounded practice that exceeds discursive reasoning while preserving a metaphysical hierarchy of gods, souls, daimones, symbols, and ritual acts."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"De mysteriis Aegyptiorum; On the Mysteries of the Egyptians, Chaldeans, and Assyrians; Theurgia","KeyConcepts":"theurgy; ritual; gods; daimones; symbols; prayer; sacrifice; divination; Porphyry; divine hierarchy; ineffability","Methodology":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP, reference entries, catalog records, manuscript/source pages, public-domain text surfaces, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported.","Structure":"One work-cluster page with Greek or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, and status note for lost, fragmentary, attributed, or transmitted materials."},"Arguments":["The work defends theurgy as a divinely grounded practice that exceeds discursive reasoning while preserving a metaphysical hierarchy of gods, souls, daimones, symbols, and ritual acts."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoras, Plotinus, Porphyry, Nicomachus of Gerasa, the Chaldean Oracles, late antique religious practice, and earlier Platonic commentary traditions.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct Iamblichus work because SEP, Britannica, Gutenberg, Sacred Texts, SBL, Commons, WorldCat, and scholarship preserve it as the central extant theurgical treatise.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, philosophy of religion, philosophy of language, mathematics, ritual theory, ancient psychology, commentary traditions, and the relation between philosophical reasoning and embodied religious practice."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct Iamblichus work because SEP, Britannica, Gutenberg, Sacred Texts, SBL, Commons, WorldCat, and scholarship preserve it as the central extant theurgical treatise."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"SplitFullTextSection","Title":"Full Text","Copy":"Full text is available on a separate page for readability.","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/on-the-mysteries/full-text/","Label":"Full Text","Kicker":"Open full text","Cards":[{"Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/on-the-mysteries/full-text/","Label":"Full Text","Kicker":"Open full text"}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["The work defends theurgy as a divinely grounded practice that exceeds discursive reasoning while preserving a metaphysical hierarchy of gods, souls, daimones, symbols, and ritual acts."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"De mysteriis Aegyptiorum; On the Mysteries of the Egyptians, Chaldeans, and Assyrians; Theurgia"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"theurgy; ritual; gods; daimones; symbols; prayer; sacrifice; divination; Porphyry; divine hierarchy; ineffability"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP, reference entries, catalog records, manuscript/source pages, public-domain text surfaces, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"One work-cluster page with Greek or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, and status note for lost, fragmentary, attributed, or transmitted materials."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["The work defends theurgy as a divinely grounded practice that exceeds discursive reasoning while preserving a metaphysical hierarchy of gods, souls, daimones, symbols, and ritual acts."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoras, Plotinus, Porphyry, Nicomachus of Gerasa, the Chaldean Oracles, late antique religious practice, and earlier Platonic commentary traditions."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Syrian and Athenian Neoplatonism, Proclus, Damascius, Simplicius, late antique theurgy, Pythagorean curriculum studies, medieval and Renaissance Platonic ritual theory, and modern scholarship on philosophy, religion, mathematics, and the soul."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Iamblichus work because SEP, Britannica, Gutenberg, Sacred Texts, SBL, Commons, WorldCat, and scholarship preserve it as the central extant theurgical treatise.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, philosophy of religion, philosophy of language, mathematics, ritual theory, ancient psychology, commentary traditions, and the relation between philosophical reasoning and embodied religious practice."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Iamblichus work because SEP, Britannica, Gutenberg, Sacred Texts, SBL, Commons, WorldCat, and scholarship preserve it as the central extant theurgical treatise."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Full Text","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":12,"Sections":24,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}