On the Soul
{"WorkMasterId":6021,"WpPageId":277507,"ParentWpPageId":193751,"Slug":"on-the-soul","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/on-the-soul/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/on-the-soul/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69376,"CleanHtmlLength":16122,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"On the Soul","Deck":"The fragmentary work develops a doctrine of soul, embodiment, hierarchy, vehicle, descent, purification, and psychic relation to intellect and divine order.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Iamblichus of Chalcis","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Iamblichus of Chalcis","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/iamblichus-of-chalcis-05-tractatus-de-divinatione-magicis.jpg","ImageAlt":"Johann Theodor de Bry engraving of Iamblichus Chalcidensis","FilterTerra":"Eastern Mediterranean","ClickText":"Iamblichus of Chalcis","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/","Copies":["245 CE – 325 CE","Chalcis ad Belum, Coele-Syria, probably near modern Qinnasrin","Syrian Greek Neoplatonist of Chalcis whose theurgy, Pythagorean curriculum, Platonic commentary, mathematics, soul theory, metaphysics, and philosophy of religion shaped later Syrian and Athenian Neoplatonism."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:1","Title":"Ancient History","DateText":"3000 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:3","Title":"Classical Antiquity","DateText":"500 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/philosophers-of-classical-antiquity/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"310 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 310 CE because the surviving fragments are assigned to Iamblichus\u0027 mature metaphysical and psychological period.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:10"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:SYR:2"}],"OriginalTitle":"Περὶ ψυχῆς","Language":"Greek","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-mind"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:metaphysics"}],"Tradition":"Late antique Syrian Neoplatonism; Pythagorean curriculum; Platonic commentary; theurgy","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["The fragmentary work develops a doctrine of soul, embodiment, hierarchy, vehicle, descent, purification, and psychic relation to intellect and divine order."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"De anima; Iamblichus De Anima; fragments on the soul","KeyConcepts":"soul; embodiment; vehicle of the soul; descent; purification; intellect; hierarchy; psychology; fragments","Methodology":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP, reference entries, catalog records, manuscript/source pages, public-domain text surfaces, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported.","Structure":"One work-cluster page with Greek or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, and status note for lost, fragmentary, attributed, or transmitted materials."},"Arguments":["The fragmentary work develops a doctrine of soul, embodiment, hierarchy, vehicle, descent, purification, and psychic relation to intellect and divine order."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoras, Plotinus, Porphyry, Nicomachus of Gerasa, the Chaldean Oracles, late antique religious practice, and earlier Platonic commentary traditions.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct Iamblichus work-cluster because SEP, Cambridge scholarship, WorldCat, PhilPapers, and De Anima editions preserve the fragmentary treatise.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, philosophy of religion, philosophy of language, mathematics, ritual theory, ancient psychology, commentary traditions, and the relation between philosophical reasoning and embodied religious practice."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct Iamblichus work-cluster because SEP, Cambridge scholarship, WorldCat, PhilPapers, and De Anima editions preserve the fragmentary treatise."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["The fragmentary work develops a doctrine of soul, embodiment, hierarchy, vehicle, descent, purification, and psychic relation to intellect and divine order."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"De anima; Iamblichus De Anima; fragments on the soul"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"soul; embodiment; vehicle of the soul; descent; purification; intellect; hierarchy; psychology; fragments"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP, reference entries, catalog records, manuscript/source pages, public-domain text surfaces, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"One work-cluster page with Greek or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, and status note for lost, fragmentary, attributed, or transmitted materials."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["The fragmentary work develops a doctrine of soul, embodiment, hierarchy, vehicle, descent, purification, and psychic relation to intellect and divine order."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoras, Plotinus, Porphyry, Nicomachus of Gerasa, the Chaldean Oracles, late antique religious practice, and earlier Platonic commentary traditions."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Syrian and Athenian Neoplatonism, Proclus, Damascius, Simplicius, late antique theurgy, Pythagorean curriculum studies, medieval and Renaissance Platonic ritual theory, and modern scholarship on philosophy, religion, mathematics, and the soul."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Iamblichus work-cluster because SEP, Cambridge scholarship, WorldCat, PhilPapers, and De Anima editions preserve the fragmentary treatise.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, philosophy of religion, philosophy of language, mathematics, ritual theory, ancient psychology, commentary traditions, and the relation between philosophical reasoning and embodied religious practice."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Iamblichus work-cluster because SEP, Cambridge scholarship, WorldCat, PhilPapers, and De Anima editions preserve the fragmentary treatise."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}