Commentary on Plato’s Parmenides
{"WorkMasterId":6026,"WpPageId":277518,"ParentWpPageId":193751,"Slug":"commentary-on-platos-parmenides","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/commentary-on-platos-parmenides/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/commentary-on-platos-parmenides/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69346,"CleanHtmlLength":16092,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Commentary on Plato\u0027s Parmenides","Deck":"The commentary treated the hypotheses of the Parmenides as a metaphysical and dialectical map of the One, being, plurality, and divine hierarchy.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Iamblichus of Chalcis","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Iamblichus of Chalcis","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/iamblichus-of-chalcis-05-tractatus-de-divinatione-magicis.jpg","ImageAlt":"Johann Theodor de Bry engraving of Iamblichus Chalcidensis","FilterTerra":"Eastern Mediterranean","ClickText":"Iamblichus of Chalcis","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/","Copies":["245 CE – 325 CE","Chalcis ad Belum, Coele-Syria, probably near modern Qinnasrin","Syrian Greek Neoplatonist of Chalcis whose theurgy, Pythagorean curriculum, Platonic commentary, mathematics, soul theory, metaphysics, and philosophy of religion shaped later Syrian and Athenian Neoplatonism."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:1","Title":"Ancient History","DateText":"3000 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:3","Title":"Classical Antiquity","DateText":"500 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/philosophers-of-classical-antiquity/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"315 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 315 CE because the lost Parmenides commentary is part of the later Iamblichean Platonic-commentary sequence.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:10"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:SYR:2"}],"OriginalTitle":"Ὑπόμνημα εἰς τὸν Πλάτωνος Παρμενίδην","Language":"Greek","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:metaphysics"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:logic"}],"Tradition":"Late antique Syrian Neoplatonism; Pythagorean curriculum; Platonic commentary; theurgy","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["The commentary treated the hypotheses of the Parmenides as a metaphysical and dialectical map of the One, being, plurality, and divine hierarchy."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Commentary on the Parmenides; In Platonis Parmenidem","KeyConcepts":"Parmenides; One; being; henads; negation; dialectic; metaphysical hierarchy; Platonic theology","Methodology":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP, reference entries, catalog records, manuscript/source pages, public-domain text surfaces, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported.","Structure":"One work-cluster page with Greek or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, and status note for lost, fragmentary, attributed, or transmitted materials."},"Arguments":["The commentary treated the hypotheses of the Parmenides as a metaphysical and dialectical map of the One, being, plurality, and divine hierarchy."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoras, Plotinus, Porphyry, Nicomachus of Gerasa, the Chaldean Oracles, late antique religious practice, and earlier Platonic commentary traditions.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a lost direct work-cluster because SEP and later Neoplatonic testimony connect Iamblichus with Parmenides interpretation and the theological reading of the dialogue.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, philosophy of religion, philosophy of language, mathematics, ritual theory, ancient psychology, commentary traditions, and the relation between philosophical reasoning and embodied religious practice."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a lost direct work-cluster because SEP and later Neoplatonic testimony connect Iamblichus with Parmenides interpretation and the theological reading of the dialogue."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["The commentary treated the hypotheses of the Parmenides as a metaphysical and dialectical map of the One, being, plurality, and divine hierarchy."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Commentary on the Parmenides; In Platonis Parmenidem"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"Parmenides; One; being; henads; negation; dialectic; metaphysical hierarchy; Platonic theology"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP, reference entries, catalog records, manuscript/source pages, public-domain text surfaces, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"One work-cluster page with Greek or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, and status note for lost, fragmentary, attributed, or transmitted materials."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["The commentary treated the hypotheses of the Parmenides as a metaphysical and dialectical map of the One, being, plurality, and divine hierarchy."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoras, Plotinus, Porphyry, Nicomachus of Gerasa, the Chaldean Oracles, late antique religious practice, and earlier Platonic commentary traditions."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Syrian and Athenian Neoplatonism, Proclus, Damascius, Simplicius, late antique theurgy, Pythagorean curriculum studies, medieval and Renaissance Platonic ritual theory, and modern scholarship on philosophy, religion, mathematics, and the soul."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a lost direct work-cluster because SEP and later Neoplatonic testimony connect Iamblichus with Parmenides interpretation and the theological reading of the dialogue.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, philosophy of religion, philosophy of language, mathematics, ritual theory, ancient psychology, commentary traditions, and the relation between philosophical reasoning and embodied religious practice."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a lost direct work-cluster because SEP and later Neoplatonic testimony connect Iamblichus with Parmenides interpretation and the theological reading of the dialogue."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}