Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s Rhetoric
{"WorkMasterId":6033,"WpPageId":277641,"ParentWpPageId":193941,"Slug":"middle-commentary-on-rhetoric","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/middle-commentary-on-rhetoric/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/middle-commentary-on-rhetoric/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69486,"CleanHtmlLength":16232,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Middle Commentary on Aristotle\u0027s Rhetoric","Deck":"The commentary treats persuasion, audience, civic speech, argument, imagination, and rhetorical proof as philosophical parts of practical and public reason.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Ibn Rushd (Averroes)","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Ibn Rushd (Averroes)","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/ibn-rushd-averroes-01-close-up-shot-of-averroes-statue-in-cordoba.jpg","ImageAlt":"Close-up of the Averroes statue in Córdoba","FilterTerra":"Western Europe","ClickText":"Ibn Rushd (Averroes)","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/","Copies":["1126 CE – 1198 CE","Córdoba, al-Andalus","Andalusian Arab philosopher, jurist, physician, judge, and Aristotelian commentator whose work in logic, metaphysics, natural philosophy, medicine, law, rhetoric, poetics, and philosophy of religion shaped Islamic, Hebrew, and Latin philosophical traditions."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:2","Title":"Medieval History","DateText":"500 CE – 1499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:5","Title":"High Medieval","DateText":"1000 CE – 1299 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/philosophers-of-high-medieval/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1175 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 1175 CE because SEP dates the Rhetoric paraphrase to 1175.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:1"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:ESP:1"}],"OriginalTitle":"تلخيص كتاب الخطابة","Language":"Arabic, with major Hebrew and Latin transmission","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-language"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:political-philosophy"}],"Tradition":"Andalusian Aristotelian falsafa; Maliki jurisprudence; Latin and Hebrew Averroism","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["The commentary treats persuasion, audience, civic speech, argument, imagination, and rhetorical proof as philosophical parts of practical and public reason."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Talkhīṣ Kitāb al-Khaṭāba; Paraphrase of the Rhetoric; Middle Commentary on Rhetoric","KeyConcepts":"rhetoric; persuasion; public speech; audience; enthymeme; argument; civic reason; Aristotle; language","Methodology":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP dated inventory, reference entries, catalog records, public source surfaces, manuscript/transmission evidence, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported.","Structure":"One work-cluster page with Arabic or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, discipline mapping, and transmission notes where the Arabic, Hebrew, or Latin state differs."},"Arguments":["The commentary treats persuasion, audience, civic speech, argument, imagination, and rhetorical proof as philosophical parts of practical and public reason."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Aristotle, Plato, al-Farabi, Avicenna, al-Ghazali, Ibn Bajjah, Ibn Tufayl, Ibn Zuhr, Maliki jurisprudence, Almohad intellectual culture, Galen, and the Greek-Arabic philosophical tradition.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct Aristotelian commentary by Ibn Rushd, supporting language, political philosophy, and rhetorical theory.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, logic, natural philosophy, philosophy of religion, law and philosophy, intellectual history, political philosophy, medical epistemology, translation studies, and cross-cultural philosophy."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct Aristotelian commentary by Ibn Rushd, supporting language, political philosophy, and rhetorical theory."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["The commentary treats persuasion, audience, civic speech, argument, imagination, and rhetorical proof as philosophical parts of practical and public reason."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Talkhīṣ Kitāb al-Khaṭāba; Paraphrase of the Rhetoric; Middle Commentary on Rhetoric"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"rhetoric; persuasion; public speech; audience; enthymeme; argument; civic reason; Aristotle; language"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP dated inventory, reference entries, catalog records, public source surfaces, manuscript/transmission evidence, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"One work-cluster page with Arabic or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, discipline mapping, and transmission notes where the Arabic, Hebrew, or Latin state differs."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["The commentary treats persuasion, audience, civic speech, argument, imagination, and rhetorical proof as philosophical parts of practical and public reason."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Aristotle, Plato, al-Farabi, Avicenna, al-Ghazali, Ibn Bajjah, Ibn Tufayl, Ibn Zuhr, Maliki jurisprudence, Almohad intellectual culture, Galen, and the Greek-Arabic philosophical tradition."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Latin Averroism, Hebrew philosophical commentary, scholastic Aristotelianism, Thomas Aquinas, Siger of Brabant, Renaissance Padua, Jewish philosophical psychology, philosophy and religion debates, medieval medicine, and modern histories of Islamic and Western philosophy."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Aristotelian commentary by Ibn Rushd, supporting language, political philosophy, and rhetorical theory.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, logic, natural philosophy, philosophy of religion, law and philosophy, intellectual history, political philosophy, medical epistemology, translation studies, and cross-cultural philosophy."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Aristotelian commentary by Ibn Rushd, supporting language, political philosophy, and rhetorical theory."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}