Incoherence of the Incoherence / Tahāfut al-tahāfut
{"WorkMasterId":6039,"WpPageId":277647,"ParentWpPageId":193941,"Slug":"incoherence-of-the-incoherence","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/incoherence-of-the-incoherence/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/incoherence-of-the-incoherence/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69562,"CleanHtmlLength":16308,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Incoherence of the Incoherence / Tahāfut al-tahāfut","Deck":"The work answers al-Ghazali by defending philosophical demonstration, causation, eternity, divine knowledge, and the coherence of Aristotelian inquiry.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Ibn Rushd (Averroes)","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Ibn Rushd (Averroes)","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/ibn-rushd-averroes-01-close-up-shot-of-averroes-statue-in-cordoba.jpg","ImageAlt":"Close-up of the Averroes statue in Córdoba","FilterTerra":"Western Europe","ClickText":"Ibn Rushd (Averroes)","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/","Copies":["1126 CE – 1198 CE","Córdoba, al-Andalus","Andalusian Arab philosopher, jurist, physician, judge, and Aristotelian commentator whose work in logic, metaphysics, natural philosophy, medicine, law, rhetoric, poetics, and philosophy of religion shaped Islamic, Hebrew, and Latin philosophical traditions."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:2","Title":"Medieval History","DateText":"500 CE – 1499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:5","Title":"High Medieval","DateText":"1000 CE – 1299 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/philosophers-of-high-medieval/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1181 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 1181 CE because SEP dates Tahāfut al-Tahāfut to 1180/81.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:1"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:ESP:1"}],"OriginalTitle":"تهافت التهافت","Language":"Arabic, with major Hebrew and Latin transmission","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:metaphysics"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-religion"}],"Tradition":"Andalusian Aristotelian falsafa; Maliki jurisprudence; Latin and Hebrew Averroism","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["The work answers al-Ghazali by defending philosophical demonstration, causation, eternity, divine knowledge, and the coherence of Aristotelian inquiry."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Tahāfut al-Tahāfut; The Incoherence of the Incoherence; Destructio destructionum","KeyConcepts":"al-Ghazali; causation; eternity; divine knowledge; philosophy and theology; demonstration; metaphysics; critique","Methodology":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP dated inventory, reference entries, catalog records, public source surfaces, manuscript/transmission evidence, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported.","Structure":"One work-cluster page with Arabic or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, discipline mapping, and transmission notes where the Arabic, Hebrew, or Latin state differs."},"Arguments":["The work answers al-Ghazali by defending philosophical demonstration, causation, eternity, divine knowledge, and the coherence of Aristotelian inquiry."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Aristotle, Plato, al-Farabi, Avicenna, al-Ghazali, Ibn Bajjah, Ibn Tufayl, Ibn Zuhr, Maliki jurisprudence, Almohad intellectual culture, Galen, and the Greek-Arabic philosophical tradition.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct work because SEP, IEP, Britannica, Encyclopedia.com, Wikipedia, Open Library, WorldCat, and scholarship identify it as Ibn Rushd\u0027s major reply to al-Ghazali.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, logic, natural philosophy, philosophy of religion, law and philosophy, intellectual history, political philosophy, medical epistemology, translation studies, and cross-cultural philosophy."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct work because SEP, IEP, Britannica, Encyclopedia.com, Wikipedia, Open Library, WorldCat, and scholarship identify it as Ibn Rushd\u0027s major reply to al-Ghazali."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["The work answers al-Ghazali by defending philosophical demonstration, causation, eternity, divine knowledge, and the coherence of Aristotelian inquiry."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Tahāfut al-Tahāfut; The Incoherence of the Incoherence; Destructio destructionum"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"al-Ghazali; causation; eternity; divine knowledge; philosophy and theology; demonstration; metaphysics; critique"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP dated inventory, reference entries, catalog records, public source surfaces, manuscript/transmission evidence, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"One work-cluster page with Arabic or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, discipline mapping, and transmission notes where the Arabic, Hebrew, or Latin state differs."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["The work answers al-Ghazali by defending philosophical demonstration, causation, eternity, divine knowledge, and the coherence of Aristotelian inquiry."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Aristotle, Plato, al-Farabi, Avicenna, al-Ghazali, Ibn Bajjah, Ibn Tufayl, Ibn Zuhr, Maliki jurisprudence, Almohad intellectual culture, Galen, and the Greek-Arabic philosophical tradition."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Latin Averroism, Hebrew philosophical commentary, scholastic Aristotelianism, Thomas Aquinas, Siger of Brabant, Renaissance Padua, Jewish philosophical psychology, philosophy and religion debates, medieval medicine, and modern histories of Islamic and Western philosophy."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct work because SEP, IEP, Britannica, Encyclopedia.com, Wikipedia, Open Library, WorldCat, and scholarship identify it as Ibn Rushd\u0027s major reply to al-Ghazali.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, logic, natural philosophy, philosophy of religion, law and philosophy, intellectual history, political philosophy, medical epistemology, translation studies, and cross-cultural philosophy."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct work because SEP, IEP, Britannica, Encyclopedia.com, Wikipedia, Open Library, WorldCat, and scholarship identify it as Ibn Rushd\u0027s major reply to al-Ghazali."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}