Long Commentary on Aristotle’s De anima
{"WorkMasterId":6041,"WpPageId":277649,"ParentWpPageId":193941,"Slug":"long-commentary-on-de-anima","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/long-commentary-on-de-anima/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/long-commentary-on-de-anima/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69541,"CleanHtmlLength":16287,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Long Commentary on Aristotle\u0027s De anima","Deck":"The long commentary develops Ibn Rushd\u0027s mature psychology of soul, perception, imagination, material intellect, agent intellect, and human understanding.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Ibn Rushd (Averroes)","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Ibn Rushd (Averroes)","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/ibn-rushd-averroes-01-close-up-shot-of-averroes-statue-in-cordoba.jpg","ImageAlt":"Close-up of the Averroes statue in Córdoba","FilterTerra":"Western Europe","ClickText":"Ibn Rushd (Averroes)","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/","Copies":["1126 CE – 1198 CE","Córdoba, al-Andalus","Andalusian Arab philosopher, jurist, physician, judge, and Aristotelian commentator whose work in logic, metaphysics, natural philosophy, medicine, law, rhetoric, poetics, and philosophy of religion shaped Islamic, Hebrew, and Latin philosophical traditions."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:2","Title":"Medieval History","DateText":"500 CE – 1499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:5","Title":"High Medieval","DateText":"1000 CE – 1299 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/philosophers-of-high-medieval/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1186 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 1186 CE because SEP dates the Long Commentary on De anima to 1186.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:1"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:ESP:1"}],"OriginalTitle":"الشرح الكبير على كتاب النفس","Language":"Arabic, with major Hebrew and Latin transmission","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-mind"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:epistemology"}],"Tradition":"Andalusian Aristotelian falsafa; Maliki jurisprudence; Latin and Hebrew Averroism","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["The long commentary develops Ibn Rushd\u0027s mature psychology of soul, perception, imagination, material intellect, agent intellect, and human understanding."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Commentarium magnum in Aristotelis De anima; Long Commentary on the De anima of Aristotle","KeyConcepts":"soul; intellect; material intellect; agent intellect; perception; imagination; psychology; De anima; Aristotle","Methodology":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP dated inventory, reference entries, catalog records, public source surfaces, manuscript/transmission evidence, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported.","Structure":"One work-cluster page with Arabic or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, discipline mapping, and transmission notes where the Arabic, Hebrew, or Latin state differs."},"Arguments":["The long commentary develops Ibn Rushd\u0027s mature psychology of soul, perception, imagination, material intellect, agent intellect, and human understanding."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Aristotle, Plato, al-Farabi, Avicenna, al-Ghazali, Ibn Bajjah, Ibn Tufayl, Ibn Zuhr, Maliki jurisprudence, Almohad intellectual culture, Galen, and the Greek-Arabic philosophical tradition.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct work because SEP, DARE, WorldCat, and modern editions identify it as central to Averroes\u0027 philosophy of mind and Latin reception.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, logic, natural philosophy, philosophy of religion, law and philosophy, intellectual history, political philosophy, medical epistemology, translation studies, and cross-cultural philosophy."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct work because SEP, DARE, WorldCat, and modern editions identify it as central to Averroes\u0027 philosophy of mind and Latin reception."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["The long commentary develops Ibn Rushd\u0027s mature psychology of soul, perception, imagination, material intellect, agent intellect, and human understanding."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Commentarium magnum in Aristotelis De anima; Long Commentary on the De anima of Aristotle"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"soul; intellect; material intellect; agent intellect; perception; imagination; psychology; De anima; Aristotle"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP dated inventory, reference entries, catalog records, public source surfaces, manuscript/transmission evidence, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"One work-cluster page with Arabic or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, discipline mapping, and transmission notes where the Arabic, Hebrew, or Latin state differs."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["The long commentary develops Ibn Rushd\u0027s mature psychology of soul, perception, imagination, material intellect, agent intellect, and human understanding."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Aristotle, Plato, al-Farabi, Avicenna, al-Ghazali, Ibn Bajjah, Ibn Tufayl, Ibn Zuhr, Maliki jurisprudence, Almohad intellectual culture, Galen, and the Greek-Arabic philosophical tradition."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Latin Averroism, Hebrew philosophical commentary, scholastic Aristotelianism, Thomas Aquinas, Siger of Brabant, Renaissance Padua, Jewish philosophical psychology, philosophy and religion debates, medieval medicine, and modern histories of Islamic and Western philosophy."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct work because SEP, DARE, WorldCat, and modern editions identify it as central to Averroes\u0027 philosophy of mind and Latin reception.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, logic, natural philosophy, philosophy of religion, law and philosophy, intellectual history, political philosophy, medical epistemology, translation studies, and cross-cultural philosophy."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct work because SEP, DARE, WorldCat, and modern editions identify it as central to Averroes\u0027 philosophy of mind and Latin reception."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}