Long Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics
{"WorkMasterId":6044,"WpPageId":277652,"ParentWpPageId":193941,"Slug":"long-commentary-on-metaphysics","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/long-commentary-on-metaphysics/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/long-commentary-on-metaphysics/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69563,"CleanHtmlLength":16309,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Long Commentary on Aristotle\u0027s Metaphysics","Deck":"The long commentary gives Ibn Rushd\u0027s mature reading of being, substance, causality, divine science, separate intellects, and Aristotle\u0027s Metaphysics.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Ibn Rushd (Averroes)","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Ibn Rushd (Averroes)","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/ibn-rushd-averroes-01-close-up-shot-of-averroes-statue-in-cordoba.jpg","ImageAlt":"Close-up of the Averroes statue in Córdoba","FilterTerra":"Western Europe","ClickText":"Ibn Rushd (Averroes)","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/","Copies":["1126 CE – 1198 CE","Córdoba, al-Andalus","Andalusian Arab philosopher, jurist, physician, judge, and Aristotelian commentator whose work in logic, metaphysics, natural philosophy, medicine, law, rhetoric, poetics, and philosophy of religion shaped Islamic, Hebrew, and Latin philosophical traditions."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:2","Title":"Medieval History","DateText":"500 CE – 1499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:5","Title":"High Medieval","DateText":"1000 CE – 1299 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/philosophers-of-high-medieval/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1190 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 1190 CE because SEP dates the Long Commentary on Metaphysics as after 1190; 1190 is the explicit normalized ordering year and the qualification is retained in this note.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:1"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:ESP:1"}],"OriginalTitle":"تفسير ما بعد الطبيعة","Language":"Arabic, with major Hebrew and Latin transmission","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:metaphysics"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:epistemology"}],"Tradition":"Andalusian Aristotelian falsafa; Maliki jurisprudence; Latin and Hebrew Averroism","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["The long commentary gives Ibn Rushd\u0027s mature reading of being, substance, causality, divine science, separate intellects, and Aristotle\u0027s Metaphysics."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Tafsīr Mā baʿd al-ṭabīʿa; Commentarium magnum in Metaphysicam Aristotelis; Long Commentary on Metaphysics","KeyConcepts":"being; substance; causality; separate intellects; divine science; Aristotle; Metaphysics; long commentary","Methodology":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP dated inventory, reference entries, catalog records, public source surfaces, manuscript/transmission evidence, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported.","Structure":"One work-cluster page with Arabic or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, discipline mapping, and transmission notes where the Arabic, Hebrew, or Latin state differs."},"Arguments":["The long commentary gives Ibn Rushd\u0027s mature reading of being, substance, causality, divine science, separate intellects, and Aristotle\u0027s Metaphysics."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Aristotle, Plato, al-Farabi, Avicenna, al-Ghazali, Ibn Bajjah, Ibn Tufayl, Ibn Zuhr, Maliki jurisprudence, Almohad intellectual culture, Galen, and the Greek-Arabic philosophical tradition.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct work because SEP and modern editions identify Tafsīr Mā baʿd al-ṭabīʿa as a major extant long commentary.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, logic, natural philosophy, philosophy of religion, law and philosophy, intellectual history, political philosophy, medical epistemology, translation studies, and cross-cultural philosophy."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct work because SEP and modern editions identify Tafsīr Mā baʿd al-ṭabīʿa as a major extant long commentary."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["The long commentary gives Ibn Rushd\u0027s mature reading of being, substance, causality, divine science, separate intellects, and Aristotle\u0027s Metaphysics."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Tafsīr Mā baʿd al-ṭabīʿa; Commentarium magnum in Metaphysicam Aristotelis; Long Commentary on Metaphysics"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"being; substance; causality; separate intellects; divine science; Aristotle; Metaphysics; long commentary"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP dated inventory, reference entries, catalog records, public source surfaces, manuscript/transmission evidence, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"One work-cluster page with Arabic or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, discipline mapping, and transmission notes where the Arabic, Hebrew, or Latin state differs."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["The long commentary gives Ibn Rushd\u0027s mature reading of being, substance, causality, divine science, separate intellects, and Aristotle\u0027s Metaphysics."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Aristotle, Plato, al-Farabi, Avicenna, al-Ghazali, Ibn Bajjah, Ibn Tufayl, Ibn Zuhr, Maliki jurisprudence, Almohad intellectual culture, Galen, and the Greek-Arabic philosophical tradition."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Latin Averroism, Hebrew philosophical commentary, scholastic Aristotelianism, Thomas Aquinas, Siger of Brabant, Renaissance Padua, Jewish philosophical psychology, philosophy and religion debates, medieval medicine, and modern histories of Islamic and Western philosophy."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct work because SEP and modern editions identify Tafsīr Mā baʿd al-ṭabīʿa as a major extant long commentary.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, logic, natural philosophy, philosophy of religion, law and philosophy, intellectual history, political philosophy, medical epistemology, translation studies, and cross-cultural philosophy."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct work because SEP and modern editions identify Tafsīr Mā baʿd al-ṭabīʿa as a major extant long commentary."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}