Critique of Judgment / Critique of the Power of Judgment
{"WorkMasterId":6063,"WpPageId":277749,"ParentWpPageId":189326,"Slug":"critique-of-judgment","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/immanuel-kant/critique-of-judgment/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/immanuel-kant/critique-of-judgment/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69011,"CleanHtmlLength":15757,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Critique of Judgment / Critique of the Power of Judgment","Deck":"Kant analyzes reflective judgment, beauty, the sublime, genius, purposiveness, teleology, organisms, and the relation of nature and freedom.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Immanuel Kant","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/immanuel-kant/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Immanuel Kant","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/immanuel-kant/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/kant-01-becker-portrait-1768-4.jpg","ImageAlt":"Johann Gottlieb Becker portrait of Immanuel Kant","FilterTerra":"Western Europe","ClickText":"Immanuel Kant","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/immanuel-kant/","Copies":["1724 CE – 1804 CE","Königsberg, Prussia","Prussian Enlightenment philosopher whose critical philosophy of transcendental idealism, autonomy, public reason, aesthetic judgment, natural science, religion, and right reshaped modern metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, politics, and aesthetics."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:3","Title":"Early Modern History","DateText":"1500 CE – 1799 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-early-modern-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:9","Title":"Enlightenment and Proto-Industrial","DateText":"1700 CE – 1799 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-early-modern-history/philosophers-of-the-enlightenment-and-proto-industrial/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1790 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 1790 CE because the third Critique was published in 1790.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:3"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:RUS:1"}],"OriginalTitle":"Kritik der Urteilskraft","Language":"German or Latin, with major German critical editions and later English translations","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:aesthetics"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-science"}],"Tradition":"Prussian Enlightenment critical philosophy; transcendental idealism; Kantian ethics; critical metaphysics","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Kant analyzes reflective judgment, beauty, the sublime, genius, purposiveness, teleology, organisms, and the relation of nature and freedom."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Critique of Judgment; Critique of the Power of Judgment; Third Critique","KeyConcepts":"judgment; beauty; sublime; genius; purposiveness; teleology; organisms; nature and freedom","Methodology":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP, IEP, Britannica, Akademieausgabe, Bonner Kant-Korpus, public text indexes, catalog records, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported.","Structure":"One work-cluster page with original title, English title, explicit integer display year, date note, evidence note, discipline mapping, and edition notes where first and revised editions differ."},"Arguments":["Kant analyzes reflective judgment, beauty, the sublime, genius, purposiveness, teleology, organisms, and the relation of nature and freedom."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Christian Wolff, David Hume, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Isaac Newton, Alexander Baumgarten, Pietism, Enlightenment science, and early modern metaphysics.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a central direct Kant work by SEP aesthetics, IEP, Wikipedia, catalogs, and scholarship rows.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, epistemology, logic, moral philosophy, political philosophy, aesthetics, philosophy of science, philosophy of religion, and the modern understanding of critique."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a central direct Kant work by SEP aesthetics, IEP, Wikipedia, catalogs, and scholarship rows."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Kant analyzes reflective judgment, beauty, the sublime, genius, purposiveness, teleology, organisms, and the relation of nature and freedom."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Critique of Judgment; Critique of the Power of Judgment; Third Critique"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"judgment; beauty; sublime; genius; purposiveness; teleology; organisms; nature and freedom"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP, IEP, Britannica, Akademieausgabe, Bonner Kant-Korpus, public text indexes, catalog records, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"One work-cluster page with original title, English title, explicit integer display year, date note, evidence note, discipline mapping, and edition notes where first and revised editions differ."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Kant analyzes reflective judgment, beauty, the sublime, genius, purposiveness, teleology, organisms, and the relation of nature and freedom."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Christian Wolff, David Hume, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Isaac Newton, Alexander Baumgarten, Pietism, Enlightenment science, and early modern metaphysics."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"German Idealism, Fichte, Schelling, Hegel, neo-Kantianism, analytic philosophy, phenomenology, moral philosophy, political liberalism, aesthetics, philosophy of science, theology, and modern debates over autonomy, normativity, and objectivity."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a central direct Kant work by SEP aesthetics, IEP, Wikipedia, catalogs, and scholarship rows.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, epistemology, logic, moral philosophy, political philosophy, aesthetics, philosophy of science, philosophy of religion, and the modern understanding of critique."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a central direct Kant work by SEP aesthetics, IEP, Wikipedia, catalogs, and scholarship rows."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}