On the Common Saying: That May Be Correct in Theory, but It Is of No Use in Practice
{"WorkMasterId":6065,"WpPageId":277751,"ParentWpPageId":189326,"Slug":"theory-and-practice","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/immanuel-kant/theory-and-practice/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/immanuel-kant/theory-and-practice/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":68954,"CleanHtmlLength":15700,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"On the Common Saying: That May Be Correct in Theory, but It Is of No Use in Practice","Deck":"Kant defends the relation between principle and practice in morality, right, politics, and international order.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Immanuel Kant","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/immanuel-kant/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Immanuel Kant","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/immanuel-kant/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/kant-01-becker-portrait-1768-4.jpg","ImageAlt":"Johann Gottlieb Becker portrait of Immanuel Kant","FilterTerra":"Western Europe","ClickText":"Immanuel Kant","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/immanuel-kant/","Copies":["1724 CE – 1804 CE","Königsberg, Prussia","Prussian Enlightenment philosopher whose critical philosophy of transcendental idealism, autonomy, public reason, aesthetic judgment, natural science, religion, and right reshaped modern metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, politics, and aesthetics."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:3","Title":"Early Modern History","DateText":"1500 CE – 1799 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-early-modern-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:9","Title":"Enlightenment and Proto-Industrial","DateText":"1700 CE – 1799 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-early-modern-history/philosophers-of-the-enlightenment-and-proto-industrial/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1793 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 1793 CE because the essay was published in 1793.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:3"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:RUS:1"}],"OriginalTitle":"Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis","Language":"German or Latin, with major German critical editions and later English translations","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:political-philosophy"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:ethics"}],"Tradition":"Prussian Enlightenment critical philosophy; transcendental idealism; Kantian ethics; critical metaphysics","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Kant defends the relation between principle and practice in morality, right, politics, and international order."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Theory and Practice; On the Common Saying","KeyConcepts":"theory and practice; right; politics; morality; freedom; state; international order","Methodology":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP, IEP, Britannica, Akademieausgabe, Bonner Kant-Korpus, public text indexes, catalog records, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported.","Structure":"One work-cluster page with original title, English title, explicit integer display year, date note, evidence note, discipline mapping, and edition notes where first and revised editions differ."},"Arguments":["Kant defends the relation between principle and practice in morality, right, politics, and international order."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Christian Wolff, David Hume, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Isaac Newton, Alexander Baumgarten, Pietism, Enlightenment science, and early modern metaphysics.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct Kant political and moral essay by SEP social-political evidence and Kant corpus records.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, epistemology, logic, moral philosophy, political philosophy, aesthetics, philosophy of science, philosophy of religion, and the modern understanding of critique."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct Kant political and moral essay by SEP social-political evidence and Kant corpus records."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Kant defends the relation between principle and practice in morality, right, politics, and international order."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Theory and Practice; On the Common Saying"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"theory and practice; right; politics; morality; freedom; state; international order"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP, IEP, Britannica, Akademieausgabe, Bonner Kant-Korpus, public text indexes, catalog records, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"One work-cluster page with original title, English title, explicit integer display year, date note, evidence note, discipline mapping, and edition notes where first and revised editions differ."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Kant defends the relation between principle and practice in morality, right, politics, and international order."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Christian Wolff, David Hume, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Isaac Newton, Alexander Baumgarten, Pietism, Enlightenment science, and early modern metaphysics."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"German Idealism, Fichte, Schelling, Hegel, neo-Kantianism, analytic philosophy, phenomenology, moral philosophy, political liberalism, aesthetics, philosophy of science, theology, and modern debates over autonomy, normativity, and objectivity."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Kant political and moral essay by SEP social-political evidence and Kant corpus records.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, epistemology, logic, moral philosophy, political philosophy, aesthetics, philosophy of science, philosophy of religion, and the modern understanding of critique."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Kant political and moral essay by SEP social-political evidence and Kant corpus records."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}