On Mind / Peri Nou
{"WorkMasterId":6563,"WpPageId":283162,"ParentWpPageId":193702,"Slug":"on-mind","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/leucippus-of-abdera/on-mind/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/leucippus-of-abdera/on-mind/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":68592,"CleanHtmlLength":15338,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"On Mind / Peri Nou","Deck":"Leucippus links mind and inquiry to necessity, causal explanation, and the atomist rejection of purposeless or mythic accounts of natural events.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Leucippus of Abdera","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/leucippus-of-abdera/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Leucippus of Abdera","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/leucippus-of-abdera/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/leucippus-of-abdera-01-leucippus-as-imagined-by-the-17th-century.jpg","ImageAlt":"Leucippus imagined by Luca Giordano","FilterTerra":"Eastern Mediterranean","ClickText":"Leucippus of Abdera","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/leucippus-of-abdera/","Copies":["500 BCE – 430 BCE","Abdera, Thrace; birthplace uncertain in ancient sources","Presocratic atomist associated with Abdera whose lost works and ancient testimonia explain nature through atoms, void, motion, and necessity."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:1","Title":"Ancient History","DateText":"3000 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:3","Title":"Classical Antiquity","DateText":"500 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/philosophers-of-classical-antiquity/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"435 BCE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Proxy ordering year only; the work is lost and survives through title and fragmentary testimony rather than as a continuous text.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:8"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:GRC:2"}],"OriginalTitle":"Peri nou","Language":"Ancient Greek","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-mind"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:epistemology"}],"Tradition":"Presocratic atomism","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Leucippus links mind and inquiry to necessity, causal explanation, and the atomist rejection of purposeless or mythic accounts of natural events."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"On Mind; On Intellect; Peri Nou","KeyConcepts":"mind; necessity; reason; causation; knowledge; atomism; natural explanation","Methodology":"Lost-work reconstruction through ancient biographical testimony, doxography, Theophrastean attribution reports, modern source criticism, and Presocratic atomist context.","Structure":"The public page presents the received title, alternate forms, proxy ordering year, lost status, attribution uncertainty, and a visible note that no full-text badge is being claimed."},"Arguments":["Leucippus links mind and inquiry to necessity, causal explanation, and the atomist rejection of purposeless or mythic accounts of natural events."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Parmenides, Zeno of Elea, Melissus, Empedocles, Anaxagoras, Ionian natural philosophy, and Eleatic debates over being, plurality, motion, and void.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct lost-work row because ancient and modern source discussions preserve an attribution to On Mind and connect it with the necessity fragment.","The work matters because Leucippus stands at the origin of atomist explanation: nature is explained through bodies, void, motion, and necessity rather than mythic genealogy."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct lost-work row because ancient and modern source discussions preserve an attribution to On Mind and connect it with the necessity fragment."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Leucippus links mind and inquiry to necessity, causal explanation, and the atomist rejection of purposeless or mythic accounts of natural events."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"On Mind; On Intellect; Peri Nou"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"mind; necessity; reason; causation; knowledge; atomism; natural explanation"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Lost-work reconstruction through ancient biographical testimony, doxography, Theophrastean attribution reports, modern source criticism, and Presocratic atomist context."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"The public page presents the received title, alternate forms, proxy ordering year, lost status, attribution uncertainty, and a visible note that no full-text badge is being claimed."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Leucippus links mind and inquiry to necessity, causal explanation, and the atomist rejection of purposeless or mythic accounts of natural events."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Parmenides, Zeno of Elea, Melissus, Empedocles, Anaxagoras, Ionian natural philosophy, and Eleatic debates over being, plurality, motion, and void."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Democritus, Epicurus, Lucretius, ancient atomism, mechanical natural philosophy, early modern atomist reception, materialism, and later philosophy of science."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct lost-work row because ancient and modern source discussions preserve an attribution to On Mind and connect it with the necessity fragment.","The work matters because Leucippus stands at the origin of atomist explanation: nature is explained through bodies, void, motion, and necessity rather than mythic genealogy."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct lost-work row because ancient and modern source discussions preserve an attribution to On Mind and connect it with the necessity fragment."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}