A Vindication of the Rights of Men
{"WorkMasterId":6705,"WpPageId":284396,"ParentWpPageId":193813,"Slug":"a-vindication-of-the-rights-of-men","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/mary-wollstonecraft/a-vindication-of-the-rights-of-men/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/mary-wollstonecraft/a-vindication-of-the-rights-of-men/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69121,"CleanHtmlLength":15867,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"A Vindication of the Rights of Men","Deck":"Wollstonecraft attacks hereditary rank, aristocratic sentimentality, and Burkean deference, defending political reform, rights, reason, liberty, and civic virtue.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Mary Wollstonecraft","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/mary-wollstonecraft/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Mary Wollstonecraft","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/mary-wollstonecraft/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/mary-wollstonecraft-01-wollstonecraft-c-1797.jpg","ImageAlt":"Mary Wollstonecraft by John Opie, c. 1797, National Portrait Gallery","FilterTerra":"Western Europe","ClickText":"Mary Wollstonecraft","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/mary-wollstonecraft/","Copies":["1759 CE – 1797 CE","Spitalfields, London","English Enlightenment feminist philosopher, republican political writer, educator, novelist, translator, historian, and advocate of women\u0027s rational education, civic dignity, and moral independence."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:3","Title":"Early Modern History","DateText":"1500 CE – 1799 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-early-modern-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:9","Title":"Enlightenment and Proto-Industrial","DateText":"1700 CE – 1799 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-early-modern-history/philosophers-of-the-enlightenment-and-proto-industrial/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1790 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 1790 for the anonymous first edition and named second edition; notes preserve publication sequence.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:2"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:GBR:1"}],"OriginalTitle":"A Vindication of the Rights of Men","Language":"English","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:political-philosophy"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:ethics"}],"Tradition":"Enlightenment feminism; republican political philosophy; educational theory; moral philosophy; rational religion; literary and historical criticism","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Wollstonecraft attacks hereditary rank, aristocratic sentimentality, and Burkean deference, defending political reform, rights, reason, liberty, and civic virtue."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Rights of Men; Vindication of the Rights of Men","KeyConcepts":"republicanism; rights; Burke; French Revolution; aristocracy; reform; liberty; virtue; reason","Methodology":"Source-backed Wollstonecraft work cluster; public texts are evidence only.","Structure":"Work page with title forms, integer year, notes, links, and no full text."},"Arguments":["Wollstonecraft attacks hereditary rank, aristocratic sentimentality, and Burkean deference, defending political reform, rights, reason, liberty, and civic virtue."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Richard Price, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, John Locke, Catharine Macaulay, Joseph Johnson\u0027s dissenting circle, Enlightenment moral philosophy, Anglican and rational Christian reform, and French Revolutionary politics.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct political pamphlet from SEP, British Library, Wikisource, Commons title-page evidence, and catalog rows.","The work remains relevant to feminist philosophy, education, moral psychology, political equality, citizenship, literary form, rights discourse, and the relation of reason, passion, virtue, and social institutions."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct political pamphlet from SEP, British Library, Wikisource, Commons title-page evidence, and catalog rows."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Wollstonecraft attacks hereditary rank, aristocratic sentimentality, and Burkean deference, defending political reform, rights, reason, liberty, and civic virtue."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Rights of Men; Vindication of the Rights of Men"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"republicanism; rights; Burke; French Revolution; aristocracy; reform; liberty; virtue; reason"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Source-backed Wollstonecraft work cluster; public texts are evidence only."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"Work page with title forms, integer year, notes, links, and no full text."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Wollstonecraft attacks hereditary rank, aristocratic sentimentality, and Burkean deference, defending political reform, rights, reason, liberty, and civic virtue."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Richard Price, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, John Locke, Catharine Macaulay, Joseph Johnson\u0027s dissenting circle, Enlightenment moral philosophy, Anglican and rational Christian reform, and French Revolutionary politics."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Feminist philosophy, women\u0027s rights theory, republican political thought, education theory, liberal feminism, literary feminism, Mary Shelley, nineteenth-century feminism, and modern capability and equality debates."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct political pamphlet from SEP, British Library, Wikisource, Commons title-page evidence, and catalog rows.","The work remains relevant to feminist philosophy, education, moral psychology, political equality, citizenship, literary form, rights discourse, and the relation of reason, passion, virtue, and social institutions."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct political pamphlet from SEP, British Library, Wikisource, Commons title-page evidence, and catalog rows."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}