Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom
{"WorkMasterId":6899,"WpPageId":285790,"ParentWpPageId":193888,"Slug":"great-treatise-on-the-perfection-of-wisdom","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/nagarjuna/great-treatise-on-the-perfection-of-wisdom/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/nagarjuna/great-treatise-on-the-perfection-of-wisdom/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69300,"CleanHtmlLength":16046,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom","Deck":"The traditionally attributed treatise connects Nagarjuna to the Prajnaparamita tradition and its massive exegetical reception in Chinese Buddhism.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Nagarjuna","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/nagarjuna/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Nagarjuna","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/nagarjuna/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/nagarjuna-01-painting-of-nagarjuna-18th-century.jpg","ImageAlt":"Nagarjuna with the eighty-four mahasiddhas","FilterTerra":"India and Central Asia","ClickText":"Nagarjuna","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/nagarjuna/","Copies":["150 CE – 250 CE","South India, often associated with Andhra","Madhyamaka Buddhist philosopher of emptiness, dependent origination, two truths, svabhava critique, catuskoti, Middle Way reasoning, and Prajnaparamita reception."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:1","Title":"Ancient History","DateText":"3000 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:3","Title":"Classical Antiquity","DateText":"500 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/philosophers-of-classical-antiquity/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"150 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 150 CE as an approximate second-century composition horizon; the page does not claim precise autograph dating.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:9"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:38"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:IND:9"}],"OriginalTitle":"Mahaprajnaparamita Shastra","Language":"Sanskrit","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:epistemology"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-religion"}],"Tradition":"Madhyamaka Buddhism, Mahayana Buddhist philosophy, emptiness, dependent origination, two truths, anti-essentialism, catuskoti, prajnaparamita, Buddhist logic, and Middle Way argument","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["The traditionally attributed treatise connects Nagarjuna to the Prajnaparamita tradition and its massive exegetical reception in Chinese Buddhism."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Dazhidulun; Commentary on the Great Prajnaparamita","KeyConcepts":"Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom; Nagarjuna; Madhyamaka; emptiness; dependent origination; svabhava; two truths; catuskoti; Middle Way; prajnaparamita; Mahayana; anti-essentialism; Buddhist logic; conventional truth; ultimate truth","Methodology":"Prasangika-style reductio, analysis of concepts, critique of svabhava, dependent-origination argument, two-truths framing, Buddhist exegetical reasoning, and philosophical compression in verse or treatise form.","Structure":"Registered Nagarjuna direct or traditional work; the page summarizes title, approximate date, language, tradition, disciplines, attribution status, source note, and non-full-text status."},"Arguments":["Develops Nagarjuna\u0027s critique of intrinsic nature, his account of emptiness and dependent origination, the relation between conventional and ultimate truth, and the ethical or soteriological implications of Madhyamaka insight."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Buddha, early Buddhist sutras, Prajnaparamita literature, Abhidharma debates, Sarvastivada and other Buddhist schools, non-Buddhist Indian logic, and Mahayana bodhisattva traditions.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Part of the source-backed Nagarjuna corpus used to reconstruct Madhyamaka as one of the major philosophical systems of Indian and Buddhist thought.","Used in debates about anti-foundationalism, metaphysics, epistemology, language, logic, dependent origination, religious philosophy, ethics, and cross-cultural philosophy."],"EvidenceNote":["Traditional attribution is disputed in modern scholarship; the work page must state the uncertainty and imports no full text."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["The traditionally attributed treatise connects Nagarjuna to the Prajnaparamita tradition and its massive exegetical reception in Chinese Buddhism."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Dazhidulun; Commentary on the Great Prajnaparamita"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"Great Treatise on the Perfection of Wisdom; Nagarjuna; Madhyamaka; emptiness; dependent origination; svabhava; two truths; catuskoti; Middle Way; prajnaparamita; Mahayana; anti-essentialism; Buddhist logic; conventional truth; ultimate truth"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Prasangika-style reductio, analysis of concepts, critique of svabhava, dependent-origination argument, two-truths framing, Buddhist exegetical reasoning, and philosophical compression in verse or treatise form."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"Registered Nagarjuna direct or traditional work; the page summarizes title, approximate date, language, tradition, disciplines, attribution status, source note, and non-full-text status."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Develops Nagarjuna\u0027s critique of intrinsic nature, his account of emptiness and dependent origination, the relation between conventional and ultimate truth, and the ethical or soteriological implications of Madhyamaka insight."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Buddha, early Buddhist sutras, Prajnaparamita literature, Abhidharma debates, Sarvastivada and other Buddhist schools, non-Buddhist Indian logic, and Mahayana bodhisattva traditions."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Aryadeva, Buddhapalita, Bhaviveka, Chandrakirti, Shantideva, Tibetan Madhyamaka, East Asian Sanlun and Madhyamaka traditions, Buddhist logic, comparative philosophy, and contemporary metaphysics and epistemology."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Part of the source-backed Nagarjuna corpus used to reconstruct Madhyamaka as one of the major philosophical systems of Indian and Buddhist thought.","Used in debates about anti-foundationalism, metaphysics, epistemology, language, logic, dependent origination, religious philosophy, ethics, and cross-cultural philosophy."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Traditional attribution is disputed in modern scholarship; the work page must state the uncertainty and imports no full text."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}