Against the Professors / Adversus Mathematicos I-VI
{"WorkMasterId":7378,"WpPageId":288222,"ParentWpPageId":193744,"Slug":"against-the-professors-adversus-mathematicos-i-vi","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/sextus-empiricus/against-the-professors-adversus-mathematicos-i-vi/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/sextus-empiricus/against-the-professors-adversus-mathematicos-i-vi/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":68367,"CleanHtmlLength":15525,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Against the Professors / Adversus Mathematicos I-VI","Deck":"Sextus attacks claims made by teachers of the liberal disciplines, arguing that grammar, rhetoric, geometry, arithmetic, astrology, and music lack secure dogmatic foundations.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Sextus Empiricus","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/sextus-empiricus/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Sextus Empiricus","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/sextus-empiricus/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/sextus-empiricus-01-riedel-engraving-1801.jpg","ImageAlt":"Sextus Empiricus in an 1801 Riedel engraving","FilterTerra":"Egypt","ClickText":"Sextus Empiricus","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/sextus-empiricus/","Copies":["160 CE – 210 CE","Alexandria (probable)","Greek Pyrrhonian skeptic from Alexandria (probable) whose works preserve ancient arguments about suspension, signs, proof, criteria, and life without dogmatic certainty."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:1","Title":"Ancient History","DateText":"3000 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:3","Title":"Classical Antiquity","DateText":"500 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/philosophers-of-classical-antiquity/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"200 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 200 CE as an approximate corpus sorting proxy; the individual book dates are uncertain.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:4"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:15"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:EGY:4"}],"OriginalTitle":"Πρὸς μαθηματικούς I-VI","Language":"Greek","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:epistemology"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-science"}],"Tradition":"Pyrrhonism, ancient Greek skepticism, Hellenistic and Roman philosophy, empirical medicine, epistemology, logic, ethics, metaphysics, signs, proof, criterion debates, and Renaissance skeptical reception","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Sextus attacks claims made by teachers of the liberal disciplines, arguing that grammar, rhetoric, geometry, arithmetic, astrology, and music lack secure dogmatic foundations."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Adversus Mathematicos I-VI; Against the Professors; Against the Mathematicians I-VI; Against the Learned","KeyConcepts":"professors; grammar; rhetoric; geometry; arithmetic; astrology; music; liberal arts; expertise; proof; technē; anti-dogmatism","Methodology":"Disciplinary critique, skeptical challenge to definitions and foundations, reductio, counterexample, and examination of specialist arts by their own standards.","Structure":"Six books against grammarians, rhetoricians, geometers, arithmeticians, astrologers, and musicians, treated here as one grouped work page."},"Arguments":["The claim to specialized knowledge collapses when its principles, definitions, and proofs are examined skeptically."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Hellenistic technical disciplines, skeptical method, empirical medical habits, and earlier debates about the teachability and foundations of arts.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Against the Professors preserves Sextus\u0027s most extensive critique of formal disciplines and the social authority of learned expertise.","It remains relevant to epistemic authority, disciplinary foundations, expertise, pseudoscience, and skepticism about technical certainty."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as one grouped direct work page. The individual M I-VI professor-book titles remain context, not duplicate child pages."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Sextus attacks claims made by teachers of the liberal disciplines, arguing that grammar, rhetoric, geometry, arithmetic, astrology, and music lack secure dogmatic foundations."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Adversus Mathematicos I-VI; Against the Professors; Against the Mathematicians I-VI; Against the Learned"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"professors; grammar; rhetoric; geometry; arithmetic; astrology; music; liberal arts; expertise; proof; technē; anti-dogmatism"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Disciplinary critique, skeptical challenge to definitions and foundations, reductio, counterexample, and examination of specialist arts by their own standards."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"Six books against grammarians, rhetoricians, geometers, arithmeticians, astrologers, and musicians, treated here as one grouped work page."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["The claim to specialized knowledge collapses when its principles, definitions, and proofs are examined skeptically."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Hellenistic technical disciplines, skeptical method, empirical medical habits, and earlier debates about the teachability and foundations of arts."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Renaissance humanism, debates about expertise, philosophy of science, skepticism toward disciplinary authority, and early modern reception of Adversus Mathematicos."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Against the Professors preserves Sextus\u0027s most extensive critique of formal disciplines and the social authority of learned expertise.","It remains relevant to epistemic authority, disciplinary foundations, expertise, pseudoscience, and skepticism about technical certainty."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as one grouped direct work page. The individual M I-VI professor-book titles remain context, not duplicate child pages."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}