Against the Logicians
{"WorkMasterId":7379,"WpPageId":288223,"ParentWpPageId":193744,"Slug":"against-the-logicians","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/sextus-empiricus/against-the-logicians/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/sextus-empiricus/against-the-logicians/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":68152,"CleanHtmlLength":15310,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Against the Logicians","Deck":"Sextus challenges dogmatic accounts of criterion, proof, sign, inference, and truth, pressing logical theories to justify the standards by which they claim knowledge.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Sextus Empiricus","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/sextus-empiricus/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Sextus Empiricus","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/sextus-empiricus/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/sextus-empiricus-01-riedel-engraving-1801.jpg","ImageAlt":"Sextus Empiricus in an 1801 Riedel engraving","FilterTerra":"Egypt","ClickText":"Sextus Empiricus","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/sextus-empiricus/","Copies":["160 CE – 210 CE","Alexandria (probable)","Greek Pyrrhonian skeptic from Alexandria (probable) whose works preserve ancient arguments about suspension, signs, proof, criteria, and life without dogmatic certainty."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:1","Title":"Ancient History","DateText":"3000 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:3","Title":"Classical Antiquity","DateText":"500 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/philosophers-of-classical-antiquity/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"200 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 200 CE as an approximate sorting proxy; the work is preserved within the larger Adversus Mathematicos corpus.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:4"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:15"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:EGY:4"}],"OriginalTitle":"Πρὸς λογικούς","Language":"Greek","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:logic"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:epistemology"}],"Tradition":"Pyrrhonism, ancient Greek skepticism, Hellenistic and Roman philosophy, empirical medicine, epistemology, logic, ethics, metaphysics, signs, proof, criterion debates, and Renaissance skeptical reception","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Sextus challenges dogmatic accounts of criterion, proof, sign, inference, and truth, pressing logical theories to justify the standards by which they claim knowledge."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Adversus Mathematicos VII-VIII; Against the Logicians I-II; Against Logicians","KeyConcepts":"logic; criterion; proof; sign; inference; truth; syllogism; representation; apprehension; dogmatism; epistemic standard","Methodology":"Skeptical examination of logical theory, regress pressure, dialectical counterargument, and critique of signs, demonstrations, and criteria of truth.","Structure":"Two books in the Adversus Mathematicos sequence, often numbered VII-VIII, focused on logicians and epistemological foundations."},"Arguments":["Any dogmatic criterion of truth or proof requires justification, but attempted justification either begs the question, regresses, or conflicts with rival accounts."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Stoic logic, Academic skepticism, Hellenistic debates about signs and apprehension, Aenesidemus, Agrippa, and Pyrrhonian method.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Against the Logicians is one of antiquity\u0027s major skeptical attacks on proof, signs, and the possibility of secure criteria.","It remains relevant to epistemic circularity, inferential justification, evidence, semantic theory, and the limits of formal proof."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct grouped work page corresponding to the logical books of the corpus."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Sextus challenges dogmatic accounts of criterion, proof, sign, inference, and truth, pressing logical theories to justify the standards by which they claim knowledge."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Adversus Mathematicos VII-VIII; Against the Logicians I-II; Against Logicians"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"logic; criterion; proof; sign; inference; truth; syllogism; representation; apprehension; dogmatism; epistemic standard"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Skeptical examination of logical theory, regress pressure, dialectical counterargument, and critique of signs, demonstrations, and criteria of truth."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"Two books in the Adversus Mathematicos sequence, often numbered VII-VIII, focused on logicians and epistemological foundations."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Any dogmatic criterion of truth or proof requires justification, but attempted justification either begs the question, regresses, or conflicts with rival accounts."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Stoic logic, Academic skepticism, Hellenistic debates about signs and apprehension, Aenesidemus, Agrippa, and Pyrrhonian method."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Ancient logic studies, epistemology, philosophy of language, debates over proof and evidence, early modern skepticism, and contemporary criterion arguments."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Against the Logicians is one of antiquity\u0027s major skeptical attacks on proof, signs, and the possibility of secure criteria.","It remains relevant to epistemic circularity, inferential justification, evidence, semantic theory, and the limits of formal proof."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct grouped work page corresponding to the logical books of the corpus."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}