On Science
{"WorkMasterId":7417,"WpPageId":288426,"ParentWpPageId":193718,"Slug":"xenocrates-on-science","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/xenocrates-of-chalcedon/xenocrates-on-science/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/xenocrates-of-chalcedon/xenocrates-on-science/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":68844,"CleanHtmlLength":16002,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"On Science","Deck":"This lost work treated science as structured knowledge of intelligible and mathematical order.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Xenocrates of Chalcedon","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/xenocrates-of-chalcedon/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Xenocrates of Chalcedon","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/xenocrates-of-chalcedon/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/xenocrates-of-chalcedon-01-uffizi-herm-bust.jpg","ImageAlt":"Herm bust known as Xenocrates in the Uffizi","FilterTerra":"Eastern Mediterranean","ClickText":"Xenocrates of Chalcedon","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/xenocrates-of-chalcedon/","Copies":["396 BCE – 314 BCE","Chalcedon, Bithynia; now Kadikoy, Istanbul","Greek Academic philosopher who systematized Plato through formal numbers, the One and Indeterminate Dyad, demonology, and the tripartite division of philosophy."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:1","Title":"Ancient History","DateText":"3000 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:3","Title":"Classical Antiquity","DateText":"500 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/philosophers-of-classical-antiquity/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"330 BCE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Year Written -330 is a site-normalized headship-period composition/finalization estimate for this Diogenes-listed Xenocratean title; it is not a publication date.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:9"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:TUR:2"}],"OriginalTitle":"","Language":"Ancient Greek","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:epistemology"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-science"}],"Tradition":"Old Academy Platonism, mathematical Platonism, Academic systematization, and Platonic theology","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["This lost work treated science as structured knowledge of intelligible and mathematical order."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"On Science","KeyConcepts":"science; knowledge; mathematics; intelligibles; demonstration","Methodology":"Lost-work reconstruction through Diogenes Laertius, Aristotle, Sextus Empiricus, Themistius, Proclus, Simplicius, Cicero, and modern Academic source criticism.","Structure":"Work page with English title, normalized BCE display year, date note, evidence note, source linkage, and no full-text badge."},"Arguments":["This lost work treated science as structured knowledge of intelligible and mathematical order."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Plato, Speusippus, Pythagorean number theory, Academic mathematics, Eleatic argument, Aristotle\u0027s criticism of the Academy, and fourth-century BCE debates over forms, numbers, soul, and gods.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Diogenes Laertius lists this title among Xenocrates\u0027 lost treatises. The work is treated as direct but fragmentary/lost Academic evidence; no extant full text is imported, and unpromoted Diogenes titles remain source/context evidence only.","Xenocrates remains central to the history of the Old Academy, mathematical Platonism, the division of philosophy into logic, physics, and ethics, demonology, formal number, and ancient debates over soul and knowledge."],"EvidenceNote":["Diogenes Laertius lists this title among Xenocrates\u0027 lost treatises. The work is treated as direct but fragmentary/lost Academic evidence; no extant full text is imported, and unpromoted Diogenes titles remain source/context evidence only."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["This lost work treated science as structured knowledge of intelligible and mathematical order."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"On Science"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"science; knowledge; mathematics; intelligibles; demonstration"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Lost-work reconstruction through Diogenes Laertius, Aristotle, Sextus Empiricus, Themistius, Proclus, Simplicius, Cicero, and modern Academic source criticism."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"Work page with English title, normalized BCE display year, date note, evidence note, source linkage, and no full-text badge."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["This lost work treated science as structured knowledge of intelligible and mathematical order."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Plato, Speusippus, Pythagorean number theory, Academic mathematics, Eleatic argument, Aristotle\u0027s criticism of the Academy, and fourth-century BCE debates over forms, numbers, soul, and gods."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Old Academy scholastic organization, later Academic Platonism, Stoic tripartite division of philosophy, Middle Platonism, Neoplatonism, ancient mathematical metaphysics, and Platonic theology."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Diogenes Laertius lists this title among Xenocrates\u0027 lost treatises. The work is treated as direct but fragmentary/lost Academic evidence; no extant full text is imported, and unpromoted Diogenes titles remain source/context evidence only.","Xenocrates remains central to the history of the Old Academy, mathematical Platonism, the division of philosophy into logic, physics, and ethics, demonology, formal number, and ancient debates over soul and knowledge."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Diogenes Laertius lists this title among Xenocrates\u0027 lost treatises. The work is treated as direct but fragmentary/lost Academic evidence; no extant full text is imported, and unpromoted Diogenes titles remain source/context evidence only."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}