Philosophy Works Master
Philosophy Works Master
| Field | Everything Else |
|---|---|
| CORE IDENTIFICATION | |
| [WorkMasterId] | Definition: System-generated unique identifier. Rule: No research. Identity column only. |
| [Title] | Definition: Standard English title used in academic literature. How to research:
Avoid:
|
| [Original Title] | Definition: Title in original language/script. How to research:
Avoid: Transliteration duplicates of English title |
| [Alternate Titles] | Definition: Other historically attested titles, translations, or abbreviations. How to research:
Avoid: Minor spelling differences unless meaningful |
| [Author] | Definition: Primary philosopher responsible for the work. How to research:
Avoid: Listing multiple unless truly co-authored |
| [Year Written] | Definition: Best scholarly estimate of when the work was composed. How to research: Use ranges if necessary → choose midpoint or dominant estimate Avoid: Confusing with publication date |
| [Year Published] | Definition: First known publication or circulation date. How to research: For ancient works → often NULL or approximated Avoid: Fabricating exact years for ancient texts |
| [Language] | Definition: Original language of composition. Examples:
|
| CLASSIFICATION FIELDS | |
| [Philosophical Tradition] | Definition: Broad intellectual tradition the work belongs to. Examples:
Rule: 1–2 max. Keep high-level. |
| [Primary Discipline] | Definition: Main branch of philosophy the work contributes to. Allowed set (align with your schema):
|
| [Secondary Discipline] | Definition: Secondary philosophical domain, if applicable. Rule: Optional. Only fill if clearly justified. |
| CONTENT FIELDS | |
| [Core Thesis] | Definition: The central claim or argument of the work. How to write:
Example structure: Argues that X is the case because of Y, rejecting Z. Avoid:
|
| [Key Concepts] | Definition: Named concepts introduced or formalized in the work. Examples:
Format: Comma-separated list |
| [Methodology] | Definition: How the philosopher constructs the argument. Examples:
|
| [Structure] | Definition: Formal organization of the work. Examples:
|
| [Notable Arguments] | Definition: Specific arguments or proofs within the work. Examples:
Rule: List named or clearly defined arguments only |
| [Quotable Lines] | Definition: Widely cited lines or phrases from the work. Rule:
|
| IMPACT FIELDS | |
| [Influence On] | Definition: Major thinkers, movements, or fields influenced by this work. Examples:
|
| [Influenced By] | Definition: Prior works or thinkers this work builds on. Examples:
|
| [Historical Significance] | Definition: Why this work matters in the history of philosophy. How to write:
|
| [Modern Relevance] | Definition: How the work is used or referenced today. Examples:
|
| VALIDATION RULES (CRITICAL) | |
| No biography leakage | Do not describe the author’s life in work fields. |
| No vague verbs | Ban:
Use:
|
| Concept density over prose | Every field must carry distinct information. |
| Canonical priority | Favor:
Over:
|
| NULL discipline enforcement | If a work does NOT contribute meaningfully to a domain → leave it NULL. |