The Incoherence of the Philosophers
{"WorkMasterId":4654,"WpPageId":234408,"ParentWpPageId":193940,"Slug":"the-incoherence-of-the-philosophers","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/abu-hamid-al-ghazali/the-incoherence-of-the-philosophers/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/abu-hamid-al-ghazali/the-incoherence-of-the-philosophers/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":67655,"CleanHtmlLength":14401,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"The Incoherence of the Philosophers","Deck":"Argues that central Avicennian metaphysical theses fail as demonstrations and that causal connections in created things are not necessary by themselves.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Abu Hamid al-Ghazali","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/abu-hamid-al-ghazali/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Abu Hamid al-Ghazali","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/abu-hamid-al-ghazali/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/abu-hamid-al-ghazali-01-ihya-ulum-al-din-14th-century-manuscript-leaf.jpg","ImageAlt":"Ihya ulum al-din Manuscript Leaf","FilterTerra":"Persia","ClickText":"Abu Hamid al-Ghazali","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/abu-hamid-al-ghazali/","Copies":["1058 CE – 1111 CE","Tus, Khorasan","Persian Sunni theologian, jurist, mystic, and philosopher whose work transformed kalam, ethics, logic, Sufism, and the reception of Avicennian philosophy."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:2","Title":"Medieval History","DateText":"500 CE – 1499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:5","Title":"High Medieval","DateText":"1000 CE – 1299 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/philosophers-of-high-medieval/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1095 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:3"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:13"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:IRN:3"}],"OriginalTitle":"Tahafut al-falasifa","Language":"Arabic","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:metaphysics"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-religion"}],"Tradition":"Islamic philosophy; kalam","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Argues that central Avicennian metaphysical theses fail as demonstrations and that causal connections in created things are not necessary by themselves."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Tahafut al-falasifa","KeyConcepts":"falsafa, causality, eternity of the world, divine knowledge, bodily resurrection, kalam","Methodology":"Dialectical kalam refutation","Structure":"Twenty discussions/refutations"},"Arguments":["Seventeenth discussion on causality; refutation of eternity of the world; divine knowledge of particulars; bodily resurrection"],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Avicenna; al-Farabi; Ashari kalam","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["A landmark philosophical critique of Avicennian Aristotelianism and one of the central works in medieval debates about reason and revelation.","Used in contemporary debates about causation, occasionalism, modal necessity, and science-religion interpretation."],"EvidenceNote":[],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Argues that central Avicennian metaphysical theses fail as demonstrations and that causal connections in created things are not necessary by themselves."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Tahafut al-falasifa"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"falsafa, causality, eternity of the world, divine knowledge, bodily resurrection, kalam"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Dialectical kalam refutation"},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"Twenty discussions/refutations"}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Seventeenth discussion on causality; refutation of eternity of the world; divine knowledge of particulars; bodily resurrection"]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Avicenna; al-Farabi; Ashari kalam"},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Later kalam; Averroes; Latin and Jewish medieval debates about causality and eternity"}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["A landmark philosophical critique of Avicennian Aristotelianism and one of the central works in medieval debates about reason and revelation.","Used in contemporary debates about causation, occasionalism, modal necessity, and science-religion interpretation."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":21,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}