De grammatico
{"WorkMasterId":4897,"WpPageId":243013,"ParentWpPageId":193766,"Slug":"de-grammatico","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/de-grammatico/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/de-grammatico/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":68400,"CleanHtmlLength":15146,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"De grammatico","Deck":"A term such as grammarian must be analyzed by distinguishing signification, appellation, substance, and quality rather than by being misled by grammatical form.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Anselm of Canterbury","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Anselm of Canterbury","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/anselm-of-canterbury-03-a-late-16th-century-engraving-of-anselm.jpg","ImageAlt":"Late-Sixteenth-Century Engraving of Anselm","FilterTerra":"Eastern Mediterranean","ClickText":"Anselm of Canterbury","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/","Copies":["1033 CE – 1109 CE","Aosta","Benedictine philosopher-theologian from Aosta whose faith-seeking-understanding method, ontological argument, account of truth, freedom, sin, atonement, and semantic analysis shaped medieval scholastic philosophy."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:2","Title":"Medieval History","DateText":"500 CE – 1499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:5","Title":"High Medieval","DateText":"1000 CE – 1299 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/philosophers-of-high-medieval/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1080 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Proxy year within the Bec dialogue cluster; exact composition year is not documented.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:6"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:ITA:2"}],"OriginalTitle":"De grammatico","Language":"Latin","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-language"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:logic"}],"Tradition":"Latin scholasticism; Augustinian Christian philosophy; medieval philosophical theology","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["A term such as grammarian must be analyzed by distinguishing signification, appellation, substance, and quality rather than by being misled by grammatical form."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"On the Grammarian; On Grammar","KeyConcepts":"grammarian, signification, appellation, substance, quality, dialectic, semantics, predication, linguistic form","Methodology":"Short dialectical dialogue for beginners in dialectic, using a semantic puzzle to train distinctions.","Structure":"Dialogue between teacher and student on whether grammarian names a substance or a quality."},"Arguments":["Anselm shows how linguistic form can obscure logical and semantic function, requiring distinctions between what a word signifies and what it names."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Boethian logic, Latin grammar, dialectical teaching at Bec.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted core dialogue because it is Anselm\u0027s explicit contribution to dialectic and semantic analysis.","Relevant to philosophy of language, medieval logic, predication theory, and the relation between grammar and metaphysics."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as an authenticated Anselm dialogue. Date is a proxy chronology year, not a documented composition date."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["A term such as grammarian must be analyzed by distinguishing signification, appellation, substance, and quality rather than by being misled by grammatical form."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"On the Grammarian; On Grammar"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"grammarian, signification, appellation, substance, quality, dialectic, semantics, predication, linguistic form"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Short dialectical dialogue for beginners in dialectic, using a semantic puzzle to train distinctions."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"Dialogue between teacher and student on whether grammarian names a substance or a quality."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Anselm shows how linguistic form can obscure logical and semantic function, requiring distinctions between what a word signifies and what it names."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Boethian logic, Latin grammar, dialectical teaching at Bec."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Medieval logic, semantic theory, scholastic language analysis, terminist logic, philosophy of language."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted core dialogue because it is Anselm\u0027s explicit contribution to dialectic and semantic analysis.","Relevant to philosophy of language, medieval logic, predication theory, and the relation between grammar and metaphysics."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as an authenticated Anselm dialogue. Date is a proxy chronology year, not a documented composition date."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}