De libertate arbitrii
{"WorkMasterId":4899,"WpPageId":243015,"ParentWpPageId":193766,"Slug":"de-libertate-arbitrii","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/de-libertate-arbitrii/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/de-libertate-arbitrii/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":68248,"CleanHtmlLength":14994,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"De libertate arbitrii","Deck":"Freedom of choice is the power to preserve uprightness of will for its own sake, not merely the power to choose between alternatives.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Anselm of Canterbury","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Anselm of Canterbury","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/anselm-of-canterbury-03-a-late-16th-century-engraving-of-anselm.jpg","ImageAlt":"Late-Sixteenth-Century Engraving of Anselm","FilterTerra":"Eastern Mediterranean","ClickText":"Anselm of Canterbury","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/","Copies":["1033 CE – 1109 CE","Aosta","Benedictine philosopher-theologian from Aosta whose faith-seeking-understanding method, ontological argument, account of truth, freedom, sin, atonement, and semantic analysis shaped medieval scholastic philosophy."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:2","Title":"Medieval History","DateText":"500 CE – 1499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:5","Title":"High Medieval","DateText":"1000 CE – 1299 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/philosophers-of-high-medieval/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1082 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Proxy year within the Bec dialogue cluster; exact composition year is not documented.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:6"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:ITA:2"}],"OriginalTitle":"De libertate arbitrii","Language":"Latin","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:ethics"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-mind"}],"Tradition":"Latin scholasticism; Augustinian Christian philosophy; medieval philosophical theology","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Freedom of choice is the power to preserve uprightness of will for its own sake, not merely the power to choose between alternatives."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"On Free Choice of the Will; On Freedom of Choice","KeyConcepts":"free choice, will, uprightness, justice, responsibility, sin, moral agency, rectitude","Methodology":"Dialectical analysis of will, choice, justice, and responsibility through compact teacher-student exchange.","Structure":"Dialogue addressing what free choice is and how it relates to sin, justice, and moral responsibility."},"Arguments":["Anselm separates freedom from indifference and defines it through the will\u0027s relation to uprightness and justice."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Augustine on will and grace, monastic moral theology, De veritate.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted core dialogue on freedom, responsibility, and moral psychology.","Relevant for free will, compatibilism debates, ethical agency, and philosophy of action."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as an authenticated Anselm dialogue. Date is a proxy chronology year, not a documented composition date."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Freedom of choice is the power to preserve uprightness of will for its own sake, not merely the power to choose between alternatives."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"On Free Choice of the Will; On Freedom of Choice"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"free choice, will, uprightness, justice, responsibility, sin, moral agency, rectitude"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Dialectical analysis of will, choice, justice, and responsibility through compact teacher-student exchange."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"Dialogue addressing what free choice is and how it relates to sin, justice, and moral responsibility."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Anselm separates freedom from indifference and defines it through the will\u0027s relation to uprightness and justice."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Augustine on will and grace, monastic moral theology, De veritate."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Scholastic theories of will, moral psychology, responsibility, freedom, grace debates."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted core dialogue on freedom, responsibility, and moral psychology.","Relevant for free will, compatibilism debates, ethical agency, and philosophy of action."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as an authenticated Anselm dialogue. Date is a proxy chronology year, not a documented composition date."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}