De processione Spiritus Sancti
{"WorkMasterId":4904,"WpPageId":243020,"ParentWpPageId":193766,"Slug":"de-processione-spiritus-sancti","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/de-processione-spiritus-sancti/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/de-processione-spiritus-sancti/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":68225,"CleanHtmlLength":14971,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"De processione Spiritus Sancti","Deck":"The procession of the Holy Spirit can be defended through rational distinctions about relation, origin, and divine unity.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Anselm of Canterbury","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Anselm of Canterbury","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/anselm-of-canterbury-03-a-late-16th-century-engraving-of-anselm.jpg","ImageAlt":"Late-Sixteenth-Century Engraving of Anselm","FilterTerra":"Eastern Mediterranean","ClickText":"Anselm of Canterbury","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/","Copies":["1033 CE – 1109 CE","Aosta","Benedictine philosopher-theologian from Aosta whose faith-seeking-understanding method, ontological argument, account of truth, freedom, sin, atonement, and semantic analysis shaped medieval scholastic philosophy."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:2","Title":"Medieval History","DateText":"500 CE – 1499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:5","Title":"High Medieval","DateText":"1000 CE – 1299 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/philosophers-of-high-medieval/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1102 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Approximate later-career chronology year; exact composition year is not documented.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:6"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:ITA:2"}],"OriginalTitle":"De processione Spiritus Sancti","Language":"Latin","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-religion"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:metaphysics"}],"Tradition":"Latin scholasticism; Augustinian Christian philosophy; medieval philosophical theology","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["The procession of the Holy Spirit can be defended through rational distinctions about relation, origin, and divine unity."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"On the Procession of the Holy Spirit","KeyConcepts":"Holy Spirit, procession, Trinity, Filioque, relation, origin, divine unity, rational theology","Methodology":"Polemic and rational-theological argumentation about Trinitarian procession.","Structure":"Treatise on the procession of the Holy Spirit in the context of Latin-Greek controversy."},"Arguments":["Anselm defends the Latin account of procession by reasoning through relation and origin within divine unity."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Augustinian Trinitarian theology, Latin doctrinal tradition, Council and controversy context.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted core treatise from Anselm\u0027s later archiepiscopal period.","Relevant to metaphysics of relation, Trinitarian logic, and philosophy of religion."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as an authenticated Anselm treatise. Date is a proxy chronology year."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["The procession of the Holy Spirit can be defended through rational distinctions about relation, origin, and divine unity."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"On the Procession of the Holy Spirit"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"Holy Spirit, procession, Trinity, Filioque, relation, origin, divine unity, rational theology"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Polemic and rational-theological argumentation about Trinitarian procession."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"Treatise on the procession of the Holy Spirit in the context of Latin-Greek controversy."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Anselm defends the Latin account of procession by reasoning through relation and origin within divine unity."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Augustinian Trinitarian theology, Latin doctrinal tradition, Council and controversy context."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Scholastic Trinitarian theology, medieval East-West controversy, metaphysics of relation."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted core treatise from Anselm\u0027s later archiepiscopal period.","Relevant to metaphysics of relation, Trinitarian logic, and philosophy of religion."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as an authenticated Anselm treatise. Date is a proxy chronology year."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}