Epistola de incarnatione Verbi
{"WorkMasterId":4901,"WpPageId":243017,"ParentWpPageId":193766,"Slug":"epistola-de-incarnatione-verbi","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/epistola-de-incarnatione-verbi/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/epistola-de-incarnatione-verbi/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":68373,"CleanHtmlLength":15119,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Epistola de incarnatione Verbi","Deck":"Christological claims about the incarnation require disciplined distinctions about person, nature, and divine unity.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Anselm of Canterbury","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Anselm of Canterbury","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/anselm-of-canterbury-03-a-late-16th-century-engraving-of-anselm.jpg","ImageAlt":"Late-Sixteenth-Century Engraving of Anselm","FilterTerra":"Eastern Mediterranean","ClickText":"Anselm of Canterbury","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/","Copies":["1033 CE – 1109 CE","Aosta","Benedictine philosopher-theologian from Aosta whose faith-seeking-understanding method, ontological argument, account of truth, freedom, sin, atonement, and semantic analysis shaped medieval scholastic philosophy."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:2","Title":"Medieval History","DateText":"500 CE – 1499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:5","Title":"High Medieval","DateText":"1000 CE – 1299 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/philosophers-of-high-medieval/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1094 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Approximate controversy-period year; exact composition/publication date is not documented.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:6"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:ITA:2"}],"OriginalTitle":"Epistola de incarnatione Verbi","Language":"Latin","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-religion"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:metaphysics"}],"Tradition":"Latin scholasticism; Augustinian Christian philosophy; medieval philosophical theology","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Christological claims about the incarnation require disciplined distinctions about person, nature, and divine unity."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Letter on the Incarnation of the Word; De incarnatione Verbi","KeyConcepts":"incarnation, Word, Trinity, person, nature, Roscelin, Christology, unity, rational theology","Methodology":"Controversial theological letter using dialectical distinctions to defend orthodox incarnation and Trinity claims.","Structure":"A polemical treatise-letter responding to errors about the incarnation and Trinity."},"Arguments":["Anselm argues against confused accounts of person and nature by clarifying how the Word is incarnate without dividing divine unity."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Nicene and Augustinian Trinitarian theology, Roscelin controversy, dialectical method.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted core treatise-letter because it is one of Anselm\u0027s principal rational-theological works from the controversy period.","Relevant to philosophy of religion, metaphysics of personhood, and theological language."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted within the user-approved core treatise set. Ordinary correspondence remains excluded."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Christological claims about the incarnation require disciplined distinctions about person, nature, and divine unity."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Letter on the Incarnation of the Word; De incarnatione Verbi"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"incarnation, Word, Trinity, person, nature, Roscelin, Christology, unity, rational theology"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Controversial theological letter using dialectical distinctions to defend orthodox incarnation and Trinity claims."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"A polemical treatise-letter responding to errors about the incarnation and Trinity."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Anselm argues against confused accounts of person and nature by clarifying how the Word is incarnate without dividing divine unity."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Nicene and Augustinian Trinitarian theology, Roscelin controversy, dialectical method."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Scholastic Christology, Trinitarian theology, medieval metaphysics of person and nature."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted core treatise-letter because it is one of Anselm\u0027s principal rational-theological works from the controversy period.","Relevant to philosophy of religion, metaphysics of personhood, and theological language."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted within the user-approved core treatise set. Ordinary correspondence remains excluded."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}