Proslogion
{"WorkMasterId":4896,"WpPageId":243012,"ParentWpPageId":193766,"Slug":"proslogion","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/proslogion/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/proslogion/","HasFullText":true,"RawHtmlLength":72044,"CleanHtmlLength":16665,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Proslogion","Deck":"The mind can seek one argument for God as that than which nothing greater can be thought, and from that conception reason toward divine existence and attributes.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Anselm of Canterbury","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Anselm of Canterbury","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/anselm-of-canterbury-03-a-late-16th-century-engraving-of-anselm.jpg","ImageAlt":"Late-Sixteenth-Century Engraving of Anselm","FilterTerra":"Eastern Mediterranean","ClickText":"Anselm of Canterbury","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/","Copies":["1033 CE – 1109 CE","Aosta","Benedictine philosopher-theologian from Aosta whose faith-seeking-understanding method, ontological argument, account of truth, freedom, sin, atonement, and semantic analysis shaped medieval scholastic philosophy."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:2","Title":"Medieval History","DateText":"500 CE – 1499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:5","Title":"High Medieval","DateText":"1000 CE – 1299 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/philosophers-of-high-medieval/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1078 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Approximate chronology year for late Bec composition; not a documented day/date.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:6"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:ITA:2"}],"OriginalTitle":"Proslogion","Language":"Latin","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-religion"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:metaphysics"}],"Tradition":"Latin scholasticism; Augustinian Christian philosophy; medieval philosophical theology","FullText":{"Title":"Full Text","Copy":"Full text is available on a separate page for readability.","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/proslogion/full-text/","Label":"Full Text","Kicker":"Open full text","Cards":[{"Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/proslogion/full-text/","Label":"Full Text","Kicker":"Open full text"}]},"CoreThesis":["The mind can seek one argument for God as that than which nothing greater can be thought, and from that conception reason toward divine existence and attributes."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Address; Faith Seeking Understanding","KeyConcepts":"ontological argument, that than which nothing greater can be thought, faith seeking understanding, divine necessity, perfect being, prayer, intellect","Methodology":"Prayer-shaped philosophical meditation combining rational analysis with monastic address to God.","Structure":"A short meditative treatise centered on the single argument and then divine attributes."},"Arguments":["Anselm argues that what is understood as unsurpassably great cannot exist only in the understanding, and he extends the reasoning to divine necessity and perfection."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Monologion, Augustine, Boethius, Psalms, monastic theology.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted core treatise and the classic source of the argument later called ontological.","Central to philosophy of religion, modal metaphysics, perfect-being theology, and debates over existence and conceivability."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as an authenticated Anselm treatise. Gaunilo\u0027s reply and Anselm\u0027s reply remain source evidence unless separately approved."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"RawSection","Title":"Full Versions","BodyHtml":"\u003cdiv class=\"dz-philo__full-version-grid\"\u003e\n \u003carticle class=\"dz-philo__full-version-card\"\u003e\n \u003cp class=\"dz-philo__full-version-provider\"\u003eCCEL\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ch3 class=\"dz-philo__full-version-title\"\u003eProslogium Monologium Gaunilon Appendix and Cur Deus Homo\u003c/h3\u003e\n \u003cp class=\"dz-philo__full-version-meta\"\u003eCollectedWork · LinkOnlyReady\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003ca class=\"dz-philo__full-version-link\" href=\"https://ccel.org/ccel/anselm/basic_works/basic_works\"\u003eOpen full version\u003c/a\u003e\n \u003c/article\u003e\n \u003c/div\u003e"},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["The mind can seek one argument for God as that than which nothing greater can be thought, and from that conception reason toward divine existence and attributes."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Address; Faith Seeking Understanding"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"ontological argument, that than which nothing greater can be thought, faith seeking understanding, divine necessity, perfect being, prayer, intellect"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Prayer-shaped philosophical meditation combining rational analysis with monastic address to God."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"A short meditative treatise centered on the single argument and then divine attributes."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Anselm argues that what is understood as unsurpassably great cannot exist only in the understanding, and he extends the reasoning to divine necessity and perfection."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Monologion, Augustine, Boethius, Psalms, monastic theology."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Gaunilo, Bonaventure, Aquinas, Descartes, Leibniz, Kant, Hegel, Malcolm, Plantinga, contemporary philosophy of religion."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted core treatise and the classic source of the argument later called ontological.","Central to philosophy of religion, modal metaphysics, perfect-being theology, and debates over existence and conceivability."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as an authenticated Anselm treatise. Gaunilo\u0027s reply and Anselm\u0027s reply remain source evidence unless separately approved."]},{"Kind":"SplitFullTextSection","Title":"Full Text","Copy":"Full text is available on a separate page for readability.","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/proslogion/full-text/","Label":"Full Text","Kicker":"Open full text","Cards":[{"Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/anselm-of-canterbury/proslogion/full-text/","Label":"Full Text","Kicker":"Open full text"}]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Full Versions","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note","Full Text"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":12,"Sections":25,"Styles":3,"Scripts":1}}