A Letter from a Gentleman to His Friend in Edinburgh
{"WorkMasterId":5511,"WpPageId":263323,"ParentWpPageId":189587,"Slug":"a-letter-from-a-gentleman-to-his-friend-in-edinburgh","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/david-hume/a-letter-from-a-gentleman-to-his-friend-in-edinburgh/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/david-hume/a-letter-from-a-gentleman-to-his-friend-in-edinburgh/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":68681,"CleanHtmlLength":15427,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"A Letter from a Gentleman to His Friend in Edinburgh","Deck":"Hume answers charges of irreligion and moral danger by defending the philosophical method and implications of the Treatise.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to David Hume","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/david-hume/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"David Hume","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/david-hume/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/david-hume-01-ramsay-1754-1.jpg","ImageAlt":"David Hume by Allan Ramsay, 1754","FilterTerra":"Western Europe","ClickText":"David Hume","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/david-hume/","Copies":["1711 CE – 1776 CE","Edinburgh","Scottish Enlightenment philosopher who transformed empiricism, skepticism, moral psychology, aesthetics, political economy, natural religion, and the philosophy of science through a systematic science of human nature."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:3","Title":"Early Modern History","DateText":"1500 CE – 1799 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-early-modern-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:9","Title":"Enlightenment and Proto-Industrial","DateText":"1700 CE – 1799 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-early-modern-history/philosophers-of-the-enlightenment-and-proto-industrial/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1745 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed year follows the 1745 publication connected with Hume\u0027s Edinburgh candidacy controversy.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:2"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:GBR:1"}],"OriginalTitle":"A Letter from a Gentleman to His Friend in Edinburgh","Language":"English","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-religion"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:ethics"}],"Tradition":"Scottish Enlightenment","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Hume answers charges of irreligion and moral danger by defending the philosophical method and implications of the Treatise."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Letter from a Gentleman","KeyConcepts":"religion; skepticism; morality; controversy; Treatise; naturalism","Methodology":"Empirical psychology, skeptical argument, historical explanation, literary essay, naturalistic moral analysis, and close attention to how belief, custom, sympathy, language, and institutions work in human life.","Structure":"The public page presents the work title, date note, disciplinary placement, philosophical focus, direct Hume authorship, and an explicit note that public text resources are evidence rather than a full-text badge."},"Arguments":["Hume answers charges of irreligion and moral danger by defending the philosophical method and implications of the Treatise."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"John Locke, George Berkeley, Isaac Newton, Francis Hutcheson, Pierre Bayle, classical skepticism, British moralists, and early modern natural philosophy.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct Hume apologetic work that clarifies the religious and ethical reception of his early philosophy.","The work remains central because Hume reframes philosophy around human psychology, evidence, probability, social practice, and the limits of reason."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct Hume apologetic work that clarifies the religious and ethical reception of his early philosophy."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Hume answers charges of irreligion and moral danger by defending the philosophical method and implications of the Treatise."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Letter from a Gentleman"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"religion; skepticism; morality; controversy; Treatise; naturalism"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Empirical psychology, skeptical argument, historical explanation, literary essay, naturalistic moral analysis, and close attention to how belief, custom, sympathy, language, and institutions work in human life."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"The public page presents the work title, date note, disciplinary placement, philosophical focus, direct Hume authorship, and an explicit note that public text resources are evidence rather than a full-text badge."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Hume answers charges of irreligion and moral danger by defending the philosophical method and implications of the Treatise."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"John Locke, George Berkeley, Isaac Newton, Francis Hutcheson, Pierre Bayle, classical skepticism, British moralists, and early modern natural philosophy."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Immanuel Kant, Adam Smith, Jeremy Bentham, J. S. Mill, logical positivism, analytic philosophy, naturalized epistemology, moral sentimentalism, aesthetics, philosophy of religion, and political economy."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Hume apologetic work that clarifies the religious and ethical reception of his early philosophy.","The work remains central because Hume reframes philosophy around human psychology, evidence, probability, social practice, and the limits of reason."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Hume apologetic work that clarifies the religious and ethical reception of his early philosophy."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}