Mingyi daifang lu / Waiting for the Dawn
{"WorkMasterId":5975,"WpPageId":276935,"ParentWpPageId":193924,"Slug":"waiting-for-the-dawn","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/huang-zongxi/waiting-for-the-dawn/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/huang-zongxi/waiting-for-the-dawn/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69479,"CleanHtmlLength":16225,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Mingyi daifang lu / Waiting for the Dawn","Deck":"Huang Zongxi argues that rulership exists for the people and that autocratic monarchy must be restrained by public institutions, law, offices, schools, and moral responsibility.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Huang Zongxi","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/huang-zongxi/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Huang Zongxi","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/huang-zongxi/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/huang-zongxi-01-huang-zongxi-portrait.jpg","ImageAlt":"Huang Zongxi portrait","FilterTerra":"China (East Asia)","ClickText":"Huang Zongxi","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/huang-zongxi/","Copies":["1610 CE – 1695 CE","Yuyao, Zhejiang","Ming-Qing Confucian philosopher from Yuyao whose political critique, historical method, Yijing scholarship, philology, music theory, geography, and loyalist ethics joined evidence to public responsibility."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:3","Title":"Early Modern History","DateText":"1500 CE – 1799 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-early-modern-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:8","Title":"Scientific Revolution and State Formation","DateText":"1600 CE – 1699 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-early-modern-history/philosophers-of-the-scientific-revolution-and-state-formation/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1663 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Usually associated with the early 1660s after the Ming-Qing transition; the public page uses 1663 as a conventional ordering date.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:10"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:42"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:CHN:10"}],"OriginalTitle":"明夷待訪錄","Language":"Classical Chinese","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:political-philosophy"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:ethics"}],"Tradition":"Ming-Qing Confucianism, Eastern Zhejiang practical learning, evidential scholarship, anti-autocratic political thought, and Neo-Confucian intellectual history","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Huang Zongxi argues that rulership exists for the people and that autocratic monarchy must be restrained by public institutions, law, offices, schools, and moral responsibility."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Mingyi daifang lu; Waiting for the Dawn; A Plan for the Prince","KeyConcepts":"monarchy; anti-autocracy; public office; people; law; schools; ministers; taxation; land; military; legitimacy; Ming loyalism; statecraft","Methodology":"Historical criticism, evidential philology, classical commentary, statecraft analysis, archival work, Yijing interpretation, geography, hydrology, and music theory. No full text is imported.","Structure":"Direct work-cluster page with title, Chinese title, date note, disciplinary focus, and evidence note. Public text surfaces and scans remain source evidence only."},"Arguments":["Huang Zongxi argues that rulership exists for the people and that autocratic monarchy must be restrained by public institutions, law, offices, schools, and moral responsibility."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Confucian classics, Mencius, Yijing learning, Wang Yangming and Song-Ming Neo-Confucian debates, Ming loyalist experience, Huang Zunsu, Donglin political memory, historical geography, and archival textual evidence.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as Huang\u0027s best-known political treatise, supported by Britannica, Wikipedia, Chinese Text Project, Project Gutenberg, Google Books, and catalog evidence. No full text is imported.","The work remains useful for thinking about public responsibility, institutional limits, historical method, evidence, language, classical interpretation, political legitimacy, and scholarship as civic practice."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as Huang\u0027s best-known political treatise, supported by Britannica, Wikipedia, Chinese Text Project, Project Gutenberg, Google Books, and catalog evidence. No full text is imported."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Huang Zongxi argues that rulership exists for the people and that autocratic monarchy must be restrained by public institutions, law, offices, schools, and moral responsibility."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Mingyi daifang lu; Waiting for the Dawn; A Plan for the Prince"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"monarchy; anti-autocracy; public office; people; law; schools; ministers; taxation; land; military; legitimacy; Ming loyalism; statecraft"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Historical criticism, evidential philology, classical commentary, statecraft analysis, archival work, Yijing interpretation, geography, hydrology, and music theory. No full text is imported."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"Direct work-cluster page with title, Chinese title, date note, disciplinary focus, and evidence note. Public text surfaces and scans remain source evidence only."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Huang Zongxi argues that rulership exists for the people and that autocratic monarchy must be restrained by public institutions, law, offices, schools, and moral responsibility."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Confucian classics, Mencius, Yijing learning, Wang Yangming and Song-Ming Neo-Confucian debates, Ming loyalist experience, Huang Zunsu, Donglin political memory, historical geography, and archival textual evidence."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Qing evidential learning, Eastern Zhejiang School historiography, late imperial statecraft, modern Chinese constitutional readings of Mingyi daifang lu, histories of Confucian learning, and comparative debates on anti-autocratic political theory."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as Huang\u0027s best-known political treatise, supported by Britannica, Wikipedia, Chinese Text Project, Project Gutenberg, Google Books, and catalog evidence. No full text is imported.","The work remains useful for thinking about public responsibility, institutional limits, historical method, evidence, language, classical interpretation, political legitimacy, and scholarship as civic practice."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as Huang\u0027s best-known political treatise, supported by Britannica, Wikipedia, Chinese Text Project, Project Gutenberg, Google Books, and catalog evidence. No full text is imported."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}