Shamen bujing wangzhe lun / On Why Monks Do Not Bow Down Before Kings
{"WorkMasterId":6001,"WpPageId":277301,"ParentWpPageId":193908,"Slug":"on-why-monks-do-not-bow-to-kings","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/huiyuan/on-why-monks-do-not-bow-to-kings/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/huiyuan/on-why-monks-do-not-bow-to-kings/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69949,"CleanHtmlLength":16695,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Shamen bujing wangzhe lun / On Why Monks Do Not Bow Down Before Kings","Deck":"The treatise argues that monks belong to a renunciant order whose highest allegiance is liberation, so their ritual relation to political authority differs from lay obedience without making Buddhism socially subversive.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Huiyuan","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/huiyuan/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Huiyuan","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/huiyuan/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/huiyuan-01-wanxiaotang-hui-yuan-portrait.jpg","ImageAlt":"Wanxiaotang portrait of Huiyuan","FilterTerra":"China (East Asia)","ClickText":"Huiyuan","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/huiyuan/","Copies":["334 CE – 416 CE","Loufan, Yanmen Commandery, Bingzhou, near modern Ningwu County, Shanxi","Eastern Jin Chinese Buddhist scholastic monk associated with Mount Lu, Donglin Temple, early Chinese Pure Land devotion, Prajnaparamita interpretation, karmic retribution, monastic autonomy from royal ritual, and the correspondence with Kumārajīva."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:1","Title":"Ancient History","DateText":"3000 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:3","Title":"Classical Antiquity","DateText":"500 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/philosophers-of-classical-antiquity/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"404 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Generally dated to 404 CE in response to Huan Xuan and the Eastern Jin debate over whether Buddhist monks should bow to rulers.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:10"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:41"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:CHN:10"}],"OriginalTitle":"沙門不敬王者論","Language":"Classical Chinese","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:political-philosophy"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-religion"}],"Tradition":"Eastern Jin Chinese Buddhism, Mount Lu scholastic monasticism, early Pure Land devotion, Prajnaparamita interpretation, Abhidharma reception, karma and rebirth, monastic autonomy, and correspondence with Kumārajīva","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["The treatise argues that monks belong to a renunciant order whose highest allegiance is liberation, so their ritual relation to political authority differs from lay obedience without making Buddhism socially subversive."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"The Śramaṇa Does Not Pay Homage to the Ruler; A Monk Does Not Bow Down Before a King; Shamen bujing wangzhe lun","KeyConcepts":"monastic autonomy; ruler and sangha; Huan Xuan; śramaṇa; non-bowing; religious authority; civil etiquette; church-state relations; renunciation; Buddhism and kingship","Methodology":"Direct work-cluster record based on reference entries, Chinese text surfaces, catalog records, and modern scholarship. Public Chinese text is evidence only and no full text is imported.","Structure":"One work-cluster page with Chinese title, English title, date note where available, doctrinal focus, and source evidence. Surviving fragments, prefaces, correspondence layers, and later textual witnesses are documented but not split into full-text pages."},"Arguments":["The treatise argues that monks belong to a renunciant order whose highest allegiance is liberation, so their ritual relation to political authority differs from lay obedience without making Buddhism socially subversive."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Daoan, Kumārajīva, Prajnaparamita literature, Abhidharma study, Daoist and Confucian learning, early Chinese Buddhism, Amitabha devotion, and Mount Lu contemplative practice.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct Huiyuan work because Britannica, Encyclopedia.com, Diancang, Kotobank, Wikidata, TOAJ, researchmap, UBC, and modern scholarship identify Huiyuan with Shamen bujing wangzhe lun.","The work remains relevant to Buddhist political philosophy, philosophy of religion, mind and personhood, karma, religious community, translation history, intercultural metaphysics, and the Chinese reception of Indian Buddhist categories."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct Huiyuan work because Britannica, Encyclopedia.com, Diancang, Kotobank, Wikidata, TOAJ, researchmap, UBC, and modern scholarship identify Huiyuan with Shamen bujing wangzhe lun."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["The treatise argues that monks belong to a renunciant order whose highest allegiance is liberation, so their ritual relation to political authority differs from lay obedience without making Buddhism socially subversive."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"The Śramaṇa Does Not Pay Homage to the Ruler; A Monk Does Not Bow Down Before a King; Shamen bujing wangzhe lun"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"monastic autonomy; ruler and sangha; Huan Xuan; śramaṇa; non-bowing; religious authority; civil etiquette; church-state relations; renunciation; Buddhism and kingship"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Direct work-cluster record based on reference entries, Chinese text surfaces, catalog records, and modern scholarship. Public Chinese text is evidence only and no full text is imported."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"One work-cluster page with Chinese title, English title, date note where available, doctrinal focus, and source evidence. Surviving fragments, prefaces, correspondence layers, and later textual witnesses are documented but not split into full-text pages."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["The treatise argues that monks belong to a renunciant order whose highest allegiance is liberation, so their ritual relation to political authority differs from lay obedience without making Buddhism socially subversive."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Daoan, Kumārajīva, Prajnaparamita literature, Abhidharma study, Daoist and Confucian learning, early Chinese Buddhism, Amitabha devotion, and Mount Lu contemplative practice."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Chinese Buddhist monastic autonomy, Pure Land devotional communities, Chinese Buddhist theories of karma and personhood, Mount Lu Buddhist scholarship, later Buddhist church-state argument, and East Asian receptions of the Tiger Brook and Lotus Society traditions."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Huiyuan work because Britannica, Encyclopedia.com, Diancang, Kotobank, Wikidata, TOAJ, researchmap, UBC, and modern scholarship identify Huiyuan with Shamen bujing wangzhe lun.","The work remains relevant to Buddhist political philosophy, philosophy of religion, mind and personhood, karma, religious community, translation history, intercultural metaphysics, and the Chinese reception of Indian Buddhist categories."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Huiyuan work because Britannica, Encyclopedia.com, Diancang, Kotobank, Wikidata, TOAJ, researchmap, UBC, and modern scholarship identify Huiyuan with Shamen bujing wangzhe lun."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}