Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories
{"WorkMasterId":6023,"WpPageId":277515,"ParentWpPageId":193751,"Slug":"commentary-on-aristotle-categories","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/commentary-on-aristotle-categories/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/commentary-on-aristotle-categories/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69543,"CleanHtmlLength":16289,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Commentary on Aristotle\u0027s Categories","Deck":"The commentary placed Aristotle\u0027s Categories within a Platonic curriculum, treating predication, names, categories, and logical classification as preparatory to metaphysics.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Iamblichus of Chalcis","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Iamblichus of Chalcis","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/iamblichus-of-chalcis-05-tractatus-de-divinatione-magicis.jpg","ImageAlt":"Johann Theodor de Bry engraving of Iamblichus Chalcidensis","FilterTerra":"Eastern Mediterranean","ClickText":"Iamblichus of Chalcis","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/","Copies":["245 CE – 325 CE","Chalcis ad Belum, Coele-Syria, probably near modern Qinnasrin","Syrian Greek Neoplatonist of Chalcis whose theurgy, Pythagorean curriculum, Platonic commentary, mathematics, soul theory, metaphysics, and philosophy of religion shaped later Syrian and Athenian Neoplatonism."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:1","Title":"Ancient History","DateText":"3000 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:3","Title":"Classical Antiquity","DateText":"500 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/philosophers-of-classical-antiquity/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"315 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 315 CE because the lost commentary belongs to Iamblichus\u0027 later commentary program after the extant curricular works.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:10"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:SYR:2"}],"OriginalTitle":"Ὑπόμνημα εἰς τὰς Κατηγορίας","Language":"Greek","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:logic"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-language"}],"Tradition":"Late antique Syrian Neoplatonism; Pythagorean curriculum; Platonic commentary; theurgy","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["The commentary placed Aristotle\u0027s Categories within a Platonic curriculum, treating predication, names, categories, and logical classification as preparatory to metaphysics."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Commentary on the Categories; In Aristotelis Categorias; lost Categories commentary","KeyConcepts":"Aristotle Categories; logic; predication; names; classification; commentary; Porphyry; Platonic curriculum","Methodology":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP, reference entries, catalog records, manuscript/source pages, public-domain text surfaces, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported.","Structure":"One work-cluster page with Greek or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, and status note for lost, fragmentary, attributed, or transmitted materials."},"Arguments":["The commentary placed Aristotle\u0027s Categories within a Platonic curriculum, treating predication, names, categories, and logical classification as preparatory to metaphysics."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoras, Plotinus, Porphyry, Nicomachus of Gerasa, the Chaldean Oracles, late antique religious practice, and earlier Platonic commentary traditions.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a lost direct work-cluster because SEP and late antique commentary scholarship identify Iamblichus\u0027 Categories commentary through later testimony and reception.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, philosophy of religion, philosophy of language, mathematics, ritual theory, ancient psychology, commentary traditions, and the relation between philosophical reasoning and embodied religious practice."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a lost direct work-cluster because SEP and late antique commentary scholarship identify Iamblichus\u0027 Categories commentary through later testimony and reception."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["The commentary placed Aristotle\u0027s Categories within a Platonic curriculum, treating predication, names, categories, and logical classification as preparatory to metaphysics."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Commentary on the Categories; In Aristotelis Categorias; lost Categories commentary"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"Aristotle Categories; logic; predication; names; classification; commentary; Porphyry; Platonic curriculum"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP, reference entries, catalog records, manuscript/source pages, public-domain text surfaces, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"One work-cluster page with Greek or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, and status note for lost, fragmentary, attributed, or transmitted materials."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["The commentary placed Aristotle\u0027s Categories within a Platonic curriculum, treating predication, names, categories, and logical classification as preparatory to metaphysics."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoras, Plotinus, Porphyry, Nicomachus of Gerasa, the Chaldean Oracles, late antique religious practice, and earlier Platonic commentary traditions."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Syrian and Athenian Neoplatonism, Proclus, Damascius, Simplicius, late antique theurgy, Pythagorean curriculum studies, medieval and Renaissance Platonic ritual theory, and modern scholarship on philosophy, religion, mathematics, and the soul."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a lost direct work-cluster because SEP and late antique commentary scholarship identify Iamblichus\u0027 Categories commentary through later testimony and reception.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, philosophy of religion, philosophy of language, mathematics, ritual theory, ancient psychology, commentary traditions, and the relation between philosophical reasoning and embodied religious practice."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a lost direct work-cluster because SEP and late antique commentary scholarship identify Iamblichus\u0027 Categories commentary through later testimony and reception."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}