Commentary on the Chaldean Oracles
{"WorkMasterId":6028,"WpPageId":277520,"ParentWpPageId":193751,"Slug":"commentary-on-the-chaldean-oracles","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/commentary-on-the-chaldean-oracles/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/commentary-on-the-chaldean-oracles/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69405,"CleanHtmlLength":16151,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Commentary on the Chaldean Oracles","Deck":"The commentary connected revealed oracular theology, divine names, ritual symbols, and metaphysical hierarchy to Iamblichean theurgy.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Iamblichus of Chalcis","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Iamblichus of Chalcis","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/iamblichus-of-chalcis-05-tractatus-de-divinatione-magicis.jpg","ImageAlt":"Johann Theodor de Bry engraving of Iamblichus Chalcidensis","FilterTerra":"Eastern Mediterranean","ClickText":"Iamblichus of Chalcis","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/iamblichus-of-chalcis/","Copies":["245 CE – 325 CE","Chalcis ad Belum, Coele-Syria, probably near modern Qinnasrin","Syrian Greek Neoplatonist of Chalcis whose theurgy, Pythagorean curriculum, Platonic commentary, mathematics, soul theory, metaphysics, and philosophy of religion shaped later Syrian and Athenian Neoplatonism."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:1","Title":"Ancient History","DateText":"3000 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:3","Title":"Classical Antiquity","DateText":"500 BCE – 499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-ancient-history/philosophers-of-classical-antiquity/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"320 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 320 CE because the work is placed near the late Iamblichean theological and theurgical commentary tradition.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:10"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:SYR:2"}],"OriginalTitle":"Ὑπόμνημα εἰς τὰ Χαλδαϊκὰ λόγια","Language":"Greek","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-religion"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:metaphysics"}],"Tradition":"Late antique Syrian Neoplatonism; Pythagorean curriculum; Platonic commentary; theurgy","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["The commentary connected revealed oracular theology, divine names, ritual symbols, and metaphysical hierarchy to Iamblichean theurgy."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Commentary on the Chaldean Oracles; Chaldaean Oracles commentary","KeyConcepts":"Chaldean Oracles; theurgy; divine names; symbols; gods; hierarchy; revelation; ritual; Neoplatonic theology","Methodology":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP, reference entries, catalog records, manuscript/source pages, public-domain text surfaces, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported.","Structure":"One work-cluster page with Greek or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, and status note for lost, fragmentary, attributed, or transmitted materials."},"Arguments":["The commentary connected revealed oracular theology, divine names, ritual symbols, and metaphysical hierarchy to Iamblichean theurgy."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoras, Plotinus, Porphyry, Nicomachus of Gerasa, the Chaldean Oracles, late antique religious practice, and earlier Platonic commentary traditions.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a lost direct work-cluster because SEP, Wikipedia context, and Neoplatonic scholarship preserve Iamblichus\u0027 role as an interpreter of the Chaldean Oracles.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, philosophy of religion, philosophy of language, mathematics, ritual theory, ancient psychology, commentary traditions, and the relation between philosophical reasoning and embodied religious practice."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a lost direct work-cluster because SEP, Wikipedia context, and Neoplatonic scholarship preserve Iamblichus\u0027 role as an interpreter of the Chaldean Oracles."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["The commentary connected revealed oracular theology, divine names, ritual symbols, and metaphysical hierarchy to Iamblichean theurgy."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Commentary on the Chaldean Oracles; Chaldaean Oracles commentary"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"Chaldean Oracles; theurgy; divine names; symbols; gods; hierarchy; revelation; ritual; Neoplatonic theology"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP, reference entries, catalog records, manuscript/source pages, public-domain text surfaces, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"One work-cluster page with Greek or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, and status note for lost, fragmentary, attributed, or transmitted materials."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["The commentary connected revealed oracular theology, divine names, ritual symbols, and metaphysical hierarchy to Iamblichean theurgy."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Plato, Aristotle, Pythagoras, Plotinus, Porphyry, Nicomachus of Gerasa, the Chaldean Oracles, late antique religious practice, and earlier Platonic commentary traditions."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Syrian and Athenian Neoplatonism, Proclus, Damascius, Simplicius, late antique theurgy, Pythagorean curriculum studies, medieval and Renaissance Platonic ritual theory, and modern scholarship on philosophy, religion, mathematics, and the soul."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a lost direct work-cluster because SEP, Wikipedia context, and Neoplatonic scholarship preserve Iamblichus\u0027 role as an interpreter of the Chaldean Oracles.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, philosophy of religion, philosophy of language, mathematics, ritual theory, ancient psychology, commentary traditions, and the relation between philosophical reasoning and embodied religious practice."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a lost direct work-cluster because SEP, Wikipedia context, and Neoplatonic scholarship preserve Iamblichus\u0027 role as an interpreter of the Chaldean Oracles."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}