Exposition of the Methods of Proof / al-Kashf
{"WorkMasterId":6038,"WpPageId":277646,"ParentWpPageId":193941,"Slug":"methods-of-proof","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/methods-of-proof/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/methods-of-proof/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69485,"CleanHtmlLength":16231,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Exposition of the Methods of Proof / al-Kashf","Deck":"The work criticizes dialectical theological methods and reorders doctrines of God, prophecy, scripture, and belief around appropriate forms of proof.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Ibn Rushd (Averroes)","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Ibn Rushd (Averroes)","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/ibn-rushd-averroes-01-close-up-shot-of-averroes-statue-in-cordoba.jpg","ImageAlt":"Close-up of the Averroes statue in Córdoba","FilterTerra":"Western Europe","ClickText":"Ibn Rushd (Averroes)","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/ibn-rushd-averroes/","Copies":["1126 CE – 1198 CE","Córdoba, al-Andalus","Andalusian Arab philosopher, jurist, physician, judge, and Aristotelian commentator whose work in logic, metaphysics, natural philosophy, medicine, law, rhetoric, poetics, and philosophy of religion shaped Islamic, Hebrew, and Latin philosophical traditions."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:2","Title":"Medieval History","DateText":"500 CE – 1499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:5","Title":"High Medieval","DateText":"1000 CE – 1299 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/philosophers-of-high-medieval/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1180 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 1180 CE because SEP dates al-Kashf to 1179/80?.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:1"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:ESP:1"}],"OriginalTitle":"الكشف عن مناهج الأدلة في عقائد الملة","Language":"Arabic, with major Hebrew and Latin transmission","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-religion"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:logic"}],"Tradition":"Andalusian Aristotelian falsafa; Maliki jurisprudence; Latin and Hebrew Averroism","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["The work criticizes dialectical theological methods and reorders doctrines of God, prophecy, scripture, and belief around appropriate forms of proof."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Al-Kashf ʿan manāhij al-adilla fī ʿaqāʾid al-milla; Exposition of Religious Arguments; Faith and Reason in Islam","KeyConcepts":"proof; theology; kalam; demonstration; dialectic; prophecy; divine attributes; scripture; religious doctrine","Methodology":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP dated inventory, reference entries, catalog records, public source surfaces, manuscript/transmission evidence, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported.","Structure":"One work-cluster page with Arabic or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, discipline mapping, and transmission notes where the Arabic, Hebrew, or Latin state differs."},"Arguments":["The work criticizes dialectical theological methods and reorders doctrines of God, prophecy, scripture, and belief around appropriate forms of proof."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Aristotle, Plato, al-Farabi, Avicenna, al-Ghazali, Ibn Bajjah, Ibn Tufayl, Ibn Zuhr, Maliki jurisprudence, Almohad intellectual culture, Galen, and the Greek-Arabic philosophical tradition.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct Ibn Rushd religious-philosophical treatise because SEP and translations identify it as a central work on proof and doctrine.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, logic, natural philosophy, philosophy of religion, law and philosophy, intellectual history, political philosophy, medical epistemology, translation studies, and cross-cultural philosophy."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct Ibn Rushd religious-philosophical treatise because SEP and translations identify it as a central work on proof and doctrine."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["The work criticizes dialectical theological methods and reorders doctrines of God, prophecy, scripture, and belief around appropriate forms of proof."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Al-Kashf ʿan manāhij al-adilla fī ʿaqāʾid al-milla; Exposition of Religious Arguments; Faith and Reason in Islam"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"proof; theology; kalam; demonstration; dialectic; prophecy; divine attributes; scripture; religious doctrine"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP dated inventory, reference entries, catalog records, public source surfaces, manuscript/transmission evidence, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"One work-cluster page with Arabic or Latin title forms, English title, explicit display year, date note, evidence note, discipline mapping, and transmission notes where the Arabic, Hebrew, or Latin state differs."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["The work criticizes dialectical theological methods and reorders doctrines of God, prophecy, scripture, and belief around appropriate forms of proof."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Aristotle, Plato, al-Farabi, Avicenna, al-Ghazali, Ibn Bajjah, Ibn Tufayl, Ibn Zuhr, Maliki jurisprudence, Almohad intellectual culture, Galen, and the Greek-Arabic philosophical tradition."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Latin Averroism, Hebrew philosophical commentary, scholastic Aristotelianism, Thomas Aquinas, Siger of Brabant, Renaissance Padua, Jewish philosophical psychology, philosophy and religion debates, medieval medicine, and modern histories of Islamic and Western philosophy."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Ibn Rushd religious-philosophical treatise because SEP and translations identify it as a central work on proof and doctrine.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, logic, natural philosophy, philosophy of religion, law and philosophy, intellectual history, political philosophy, medical epistemology, translation studies, and cross-cultural philosophy."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Ibn Rushd religious-philosophical treatise because SEP and translations identify it as a central work on proof and doctrine."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}