The Conflict of the Faculties
{"WorkMasterId":6069,"WpPageId":277755,"ParentWpPageId":189326,"Slug":"conflict-of-the-faculties","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/immanuel-kant/conflict-of-the-faculties/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/immanuel-kant/conflict-of-the-faculties/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":68892,"CleanHtmlLength":15638,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"The Conflict of the Faculties","Deck":"Kant examines the relation among philosophy, theology, law, medicine, university authority, censorship, and public reason.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Immanuel Kant","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/immanuel-kant/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Immanuel Kant","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/immanuel-kant/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/kant-01-becker-portrait-1768-4.jpg","ImageAlt":"Johann Gottlieb Becker portrait of Immanuel Kant","FilterTerra":"Western Europe","ClickText":"Immanuel Kant","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/immanuel-kant/","Copies":["1724 CE – 1804 CE","Königsberg, Prussia","Prussian Enlightenment philosopher whose critical philosophy of transcendental idealism, autonomy, public reason, aesthetic judgment, natural science, religion, and right reshaped modern metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, politics, and aesthetics."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:3","Title":"Early Modern History","DateText":"1500 CE – 1799 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-early-modern-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:9","Title":"Enlightenment and Proto-Industrial","DateText":"1700 CE – 1799 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-early-modern-history/philosophers-of-the-enlightenment-and-proto-industrial/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1798 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 1798 CE because the work was published in 1798.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:3"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:RUS:1"}],"OriginalTitle":"Der Streit der Fakultäten","Language":"German or Latin, with major German critical editions and later English translations","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:political-philosophy"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-religion"}],"Tradition":"Prussian Enlightenment critical philosophy; transcendental idealism; Kantian ethics; critical metaphysics","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Kant examines the relation among philosophy, theology, law, medicine, university authority, censorship, and public reason."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Conflict of the Faculties","KeyConcepts":"university; faculties; philosophy; theology; law; medicine; public reason; censorship; Enlightenment","Methodology":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP, IEP, Britannica, Akademieausgabe, Bonner Kant-Korpus, public text indexes, catalog records, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported.","Structure":"One work-cluster page with original title, English title, explicit integer display year, date note, evidence note, discipline mapping, and edition notes where first and revised editions differ."},"Arguments":["Kant examines the relation among philosophy, theology, law, medicine, university authority, censorship, and public reason."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Christian Wolff, David Hume, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Isaac Newton, Alexander Baumgarten, Pietism, Enlightenment science, and early modern metaphysics.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct Kant work by Kant corpus, catalog, and scholarship evidence.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, epistemology, logic, moral philosophy, political philosophy, aesthetics, philosophy of science, philosophy of religion, and the modern understanding of critique."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct Kant work by Kant corpus, catalog, and scholarship evidence."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Kant examines the relation among philosophy, theology, law, medicine, university authority, censorship, and public reason."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Conflict of the Faculties"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"university; faculties; philosophy; theology; law; medicine; public reason; censorship; Enlightenment"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Direct work-cluster record based on SEP, IEP, Britannica, Akademieausgabe, Bonner Kant-Korpus, public text indexes, catalog records, and modern scholarship. Public text surfaces are evidence only and no full text is imported."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"One work-cluster page with original title, English title, explicit integer display year, date note, evidence note, discipline mapping, and edition notes where first and revised editions differ."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Kant examines the relation among philosophy, theology, law, medicine, university authority, censorship, and public reason."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Christian Wolff, David Hume, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Isaac Newton, Alexander Baumgarten, Pietism, Enlightenment science, and early modern metaphysics."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"German Idealism, Fichte, Schelling, Hegel, neo-Kantianism, analytic philosophy, phenomenology, moral philosophy, political liberalism, aesthetics, philosophy of science, theology, and modern debates over autonomy, normativity, and objectivity."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Kant work by Kant corpus, catalog, and scholarship evidence.","The work remains relevant to metaphysics, epistemology, logic, moral philosophy, political philosophy, aesthetics, philosophy of science, philosophy of religion, and the modern understanding of critique."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Kant work by Kant corpus, catalog, and scholarship evidence."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}