De falso credita et ementita Constantini donatione declamatio
{"WorkMasterId":6591,"WpPageId":283381,"ParentWpPageId":193793,"Slug":"donation-of-constantine-declamatio","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/lorenzo-valla/donation-of-constantine-declamatio/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/lorenzo-valla/donation-of-constantine-declamatio/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69407,"CleanHtmlLength":16153,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"De falso credita et ementita Constantini donatione declamatio","Deck":"Valla uses philology, historical criticism, and rhetorical argument to show that the Donation of Constantine is a forgery.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Lorenzo Valla","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/lorenzo-valla/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Lorenzo Valla","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/lorenzo-valla/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/lorenzo-valla-01-lorenzo-valla-portrait.jpg","ImageAlt":"Rijksmuseum/de Bry portrait print of Lorenzo Valla","FilterTerra":"Eastern Mediterranean","ClickText":"Lorenzo Valla","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/lorenzo-valla/","Copies":["1407 CE – 1457 CE","Rome","Italian Renaissance humanist, philologist, philosopher, textual critic, translator, and Catholic priest whose critique of scholasticism, Latin style, biblical scholarship, and exposure of the Donation of Constantine reshaped humanist method."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:3","Title":"Early Modern History","DateText":"1500 CE – 1799 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-early-modern-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:7","Title":"Renaissance and Reformation","DateText":"1500 CE – 1599 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-early-modern-history/philosophers-of-the-renaissance-and-reformation/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1440 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 1440, the standard date for Valla\u0027s declamation against the Donation.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:2"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:6"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:ITA:2"}],"OriginalTitle":"De falso credita et ementita Constantini donatione declamatio","Language":"Latin","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:political-philosophy"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:philosophy-of-language"}],"Tradition":"Italian Renaissance humanism; philology; rhetoric; humanist moral philosophy; textual criticism; critique of scholasticism; biblical scholarship","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Valla uses philology, historical criticism, and rhetorical argument to show that the Donation of Constantine is a forgery."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Discourse on the Forgery of the Donation of Constantine; Treatise on the Donation of Constantine","KeyConcepts":"Donation of Constantine; forgery; papal temporal power; philology; historical criticism; anachronism; rhetoric","Methodology":"Direct Lorenzo Valla work-cluster record based on SEP, Britannica, Treccani, New Advent, catalog records, manuscript/source images, and scholarship rows. Readable source texts are cited only as external evidence.","Structure":"One work-cluster page with Latin and English title forms, explicit integer display year, date note, evidence note, source linkage, and discipline mapping."},"Arguments":["Valla uses philology, historical criticism, and rhetorical argument to show that the Donation of Constantine is a forgery."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Cicero, Quintilian, Epicurean ethics, Christian theology, Greek historiography, Roman law and rhetoric, humanist circles around Rome, Pavia, Naples, and the papal court.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct Valla work from Britannica, SEP, New Advent, Project Gutenberg, Commons, Internet Archive, and scholarship evidence.","The work remains relevant to philology, textual criticism, language philosophy, historical method, rhetoric, moral philosophy, theology, and Renaissance humanism."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct Valla work from Britannica, SEP, New Advent, Project Gutenberg, Commons, Internet Archive, and scholarship evidence."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Valla uses philology, historical criticism, and rhetorical argument to show that the Donation of Constantine is a forgery."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Discourse on the Forgery of the Donation of Constantine; Treatise on the Donation of Constantine"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"Donation of Constantine; forgery; papal temporal power; philology; historical criticism; anachronism; rhetoric"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Direct Lorenzo Valla work-cluster record based on SEP, Britannica, Treccani, New Advent, catalog records, manuscript/source images, and scholarship rows. Readable source texts are cited only as external evidence."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"One work-cluster page with Latin and English title forms, explicit integer display year, date note, evidence note, source linkage, and discipline mapping."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Valla uses philology, historical criticism, and rhetorical argument to show that the Donation of Constantine is a forgery."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Cicero, Quintilian, Epicurean ethics, Christian theology, Greek historiography, Roman law and rhetoric, humanist circles around Rome, Pavia, Naples, and the papal court."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Renaissance humanism, textual criticism, classical scholarship, humanist logic, biblical philology, Reformation-era critique, Erasmus, histories of the Donation of Constantine, and early modern debates over language and method."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Valla work from Britannica, SEP, New Advent, Project Gutenberg, Commons, Internet Archive, and scholarship evidence.","The work remains relevant to philology, textual criticism, language philosophy, historical method, rhetoric, moral philosophy, theology, and Renaissance humanism."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Valla work from Britannica, SEP, New Advent, Project Gutenberg, Commons, Internet Archive, and scholarship evidence."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}