Montaigne and the Function of Skepticism
{"WorkMasterId":6738,"WpPageId":284624,"ParentWpPageId":193833,"Slug":"montaigne-and-the-function-of-skepticism","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/max-horkheimer/montaigne-and-the-function-of-skepticism/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/max-horkheimer/montaigne-and-the-function-of-skepticism/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":68597,"CleanHtmlLength":15343,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Montaigne and the Function of Skepticism","Deck":"Horkheimer reads skepticism as historically ambivalent: a challenge to dogma that can also become resignation if detached from social critique.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Max Horkheimer","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/max-horkheimer/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Max Horkheimer","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/max-horkheimer/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/max-horkheimer-01-max-horkheimer-portrait.jpg","ImageAlt":"Max Horkheimer portrait","FilterTerra":"Western Europe","ClickText":"Max Horkheimer","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/max-horkheimer/","Copies":["1895 CE – 1973 CE","Stuttgart","German philosopher of Frankfurt School critical theory, Western Marxism, interdisciplinary social philosophy, instrumental reason, authoritarianism, culture industry, and late negative-theological reflection."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:5","Title":"Contemporary History","DateText":"1945 CE – 2065 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-contemporary-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:12","Title":"World War Era","DateText":"1914 CE – 1944 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-modern-history/philosophers-of-the-world-war-era/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1938 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 1938 for the essay; notes preserve journal/essay transmission and later collection evidence.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:3"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:DEU:1"}],"OriginalTitle":"Montaigne und die Funktion der Skepsis","Language":"German; English","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:epistemology"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:ethics"}],"Tradition":"Frankfurt School critical theory; Western Marxism; interdisciplinary social philosophy; critique of instrumental reason; social research; negative theology","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Horkheimer reads skepticism as historically ambivalent: a challenge to dogma that can also become resignation if detached from social critique."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Montaigne and the Function of Skepticism","KeyConcepts":"Montaigne; skepticism; dogma; resignation; critique; truth; history","Methodology":"Source-backed Max Horkheimer work cluster; public previews, scans, repository copies, and readable PDFs are evidence only.","Structure":"Work page with title forms, integer year, date notes, evidence notes, links, and no full text."},"Arguments":["Horkheimer reads skepticism as historically ambivalent: a challenge to dogma that can also become resignation if detached from social critique."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Marx, Kant, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Freud, Weber, Lukacs, Pollock, Adorno, Benjamin, and the Institute for Social Research.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted as a direct Horkheimer essay from bibliography, collected-work, and scholarship evidence.","The work remains relevant to domination, authoritarianism, antisemitism, capitalism, culture industry, instrumental reason, ideology critique, social research, secularization, and the relation between theory and emancipatory practice."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct Horkheimer essay from bibliography, collected-work, and scholarship evidence."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Horkheimer reads skepticism as historically ambivalent: a challenge to dogma that can also become resignation if detached from social critique."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Montaigne and the Function of Skepticism"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"Montaigne; skepticism; dogma; resignation; critique; truth; history"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Source-backed Max Horkheimer work cluster; public previews, scans, repository copies, and readable PDFs are evidence only."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"Work page with title forms, integer year, date notes, evidence notes, links, and no full text."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Horkheimer reads skepticism as historically ambivalent: a challenge to dogma that can also become resignation if detached from social critique."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Marx, Kant, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Freud, Weber, Lukacs, Pollock, Adorno, Benjamin, and the Institute for Social Research."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Frankfurt School critical theory, Western Marxism, social philosophy, cultural criticism, sociology, political theory, philosophy of social science, critique of domination, and later theories of instrumental reason."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Horkheimer essay from bibliography, collected-work, and scholarship evidence.","The work remains relevant to domination, authoritarianism, antisemitism, capitalism, culture industry, instrumental reason, ideology critique, social research, secularization, and the relation between theory and emancipatory practice."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Horkheimer essay from bibliography, collected-work, and scholarship evidence."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}