Dialogue between Sulla and Eucrates
{"WorkMasterId":6849,"WpPageId":285734,"ParentWpPageId":193810,"Slug":"dialogue-between-sulla-and-eucrates","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/montesquieu-charles-louis-de-secondat/dialogue-between-sulla-and-eucrates/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/montesquieu-charles-louis-de-secondat/dialogue-between-sulla-and-eucrates/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":69419,"CleanHtmlLength":16165,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Dialogue between Sulla and Eucrates","Deck":"Montesquieu stages a dialogue on power, ambition, tyranny, republican virtue, and the moral psychology of political domination.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Montesquieu (Charles-Louis de Secondat)","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/montesquieu-charles-louis-de-secondat/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Montesquieu (Charles-Louis de Secondat)","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/montesquieu-charles-louis-de-secondat/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/montesquieu-charles-louis-de-secondat-01-portrait-by-an-anonymous-artist-c-1753-1794.jpg","ImageAlt":"Portrait of Montesquieu after Jacques-Antoine Dassier","FilterTerra":"Western Europe","ClickText":"Montesquieu (Charles-Louis de Secondat)","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/montesquieu-charles-louis-de-secondat/","Copies":["1689 CE – 1755 CE","Chateau de la Brede, near Bordeaux","Enlightenment political philosopher of separation of powers, comparative law, rule of law, political liberty, commerce, climate, moderation, and despotism."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:3","Title":"Early Modern History","DateText":"1500 CE – 1799 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-early-modern-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:8","Title":"Scientific Revolution and State Formation","DateText":"1600 CE – 1699 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-early-modern-history/philosophers-of-the-scientific-revolution-and-state-formation/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1724 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 1724 CE for the published dialogue.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:1"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:FRA:1"}],"OriginalTitle":"Dialogue de Sylla et d\u0027Eucrate","Language":"French","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:political-philosophy"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:ethics"}],"Tradition":"Enlightenment political philosophy, comparative law, constitutionalism, separation of powers, political liberty, commerce, climate, moeurs, moderation, and criticism of despotism","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Montesquieu stages a dialogue on power, ambition, tyranny, republican virtue, and the moral psychology of political domination."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Dialogue de Sylla et d\u0027Eucrate; Dialogue between Sylla and Eucrates","KeyConcepts":"Dialogue between Sulla and Eucrates; Montesquieu; Charles-Louis de Secondat; Spirit of the Laws; Persian Letters; separation of powers; mixed government; rule of law; political liberty; despotism; commerce; climate; comparative law; Enlightenment","Methodology":"Comparative historical and political analysis of laws, regimes, manners, climate, commerce, religion, institutions, and the conditions of liberty.","Structure":"Direct Montesquieu work row registered without importing full text; the page summarizes title, date, language, tradition, disciplines, status, and source evidence."},"Arguments":["Contributes to Montesquieu\u0027s account of how laws, institutions, regimes, manners, economy, geography, religion, and historical conditions shape political liberty or despotism."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"Aristotle, Polybius, Cicero, Roman history, Tacitus, John Locke, English constitutionalism, natural law, travel literature, and early modern political history.","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Part of Montesquieu\u0027s direct corpus, used to reconstruct his development from literary satire and Roman history to comparative law and constitutional political philosophy.","Used in contemporary debates on constitutional design, rule of law, comparative politics, political liberty, despotism, commerce, institutional checks, and civic moderation."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted as a direct Montesquieu work through major-works, bibliography, catalog, and reference evidence."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Montesquieu stages a dialogue on power, ambition, tyranny, republican virtue, and the moral psychology of political domination."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Dialogue de Sylla et d\u0027Eucrate; Dialogue between Sylla and Eucrates"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"Dialogue between Sulla and Eucrates; Montesquieu; Charles-Louis de Secondat; Spirit of the Laws; Persian Letters; separation of powers; mixed government; rule of law; political liberty; despotism; commerce; climate; comparative law; Enlightenment"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Comparative historical and political analysis of laws, regimes, manners, climate, commerce, religion, institutions, and the conditions of liberty."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"Direct Montesquieu work row registered without importing full text; the page summarizes title, date, language, tradition, disciplines, status, and source evidence."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Contributes to Montesquieu\u0027s account of how laws, institutions, regimes, manners, economy, geography, religion, and historical conditions shape political liberty or despotism."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":"Aristotle, Polybius, Cicero, Roman history, Tacitus, John Locke, English constitutionalism, natural law, travel literature, and early modern political history."},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":"Enlightenment political philosophy, liberal constitutionalism, republicanism, comparative law, sociology, political science, Federalist constitutional thought, and modern separation-of-powers doctrine."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Part of Montesquieu\u0027s direct corpus, used to reconstruct his development from literary satire and Roman history to comparative law and constitutional political philosophy.","Used in contemporary debates on constitutional design, rule of law, comparative politics, political liberty, despotism, commerce, institutional checks, and civic moderation."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted as a direct Montesquieu work through major-works, bibliography, catalog, and reference evidence."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}