The Concept of Irony / Om Begrebet Ironi
{"WorkMasterId":7776,"WpPageId":289640,"ParentWpPageId":193818,"Slug":"concept-of-irony-om-begrebet-ironi","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/soren-kierkegaard/concept-of-irony-om-begrebet-ironi/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/soren-kierkegaard/concept-of-irony-om-begrebet-ironi/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":68480,"CleanHtmlLength":15092,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"The Concept of Irony / Om Begrebet Ironi","Deck":"Kierkegaard interprets irony as a negative, distancing power that exposes received life while requiring ethical and religious limits.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Søren Kierkegaard","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/soren-kierkegaard/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Søren Kierkegaard","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/soren-kierkegaard/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/soren-kierkegaard-01-unfinished-sketch-of-kierkegaard-by-his-cousin.jpg","ImageAlt":"Unfinished sketch of Soren Kierkegaard","FilterTerra":"Western Europe","ClickText":"Søren Kierkegaard","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/soren-kierkegaard/","Copies":["1813 CE – 1855 CE","Copenhagen","Danish philosopher of subjectivity, indirect communication, pseudonymous authorship, anxiety, despair, faith, love, the single individual, and critique of Christendom."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:4","Title":"Modern History","DateText":"1800 CE – 1944 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-modern-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:11","Title":"Long 19th Century","DateText":"1870 CE – 1913 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-modern-history/philosophers-of-the-long-19th-century/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1841 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Displayed as 1841, the dissertation year; evidence preserves its academic form and Socratic-Hegelian context.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:2"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:DNK:1"}],"OriginalTitle":"Om Begrebet Ironi med stadigt Hensyn til Socrates","Language":"Danish","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:aesthetics"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:epistemology"}],"Tradition":"Danish Golden Age philosophy, existential Christianity, indirect communication, pseudonymous authorship, religious ethics, subjectivity, anxiety, despair, irony, love, and critique of Christendom","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Kierkegaard interprets irony as a negative, distancing power that exposes received life while requiring ethical and religious limits."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"The Concept of Irony; Om Begrebet Ironi","KeyConcepts":"The Concept of Irony; Om Begrebet Ironi","Methodology":"Academic dissertation, literary-philosophical interpretation, Socratic analysis, and critique of speculative mediation.","Structure":"A dissertation that reads Socratic irony and modern Romantic irony as contrasting forms of negative freedom."},"Arguments":["Kierkegaard interprets irony as a negative, distancing power that exposes received life while requiring ethical and religious limits."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Accepted from SEP, IEP, SKS, bibliography rows, and Kierkegaard work chronology.","Relevant to irony, critique, subjectivity, authorship, literary philosophy, and the relation between negative freedom and ethical life."],"EvidenceNote":["Accepted from SEP, IEP, SKS, bibliography rows, and Kierkegaard work chronology."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Kierkegaard interprets irony as a negative, distancing power that exposes received life while requiring ethical and religious limits."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"The Concept of Irony; Om Begrebet Ironi"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"The Concept of Irony; Om Begrebet Ironi"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Academic dissertation, literary-philosophical interpretation, Socratic analysis, and critique of speculative mediation."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"A dissertation that reads Socratic irony and modern Romantic irony as contrasting forms of negative freedom."}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Kierkegaard interprets irony as a negative, distancing power that exposes received life while requiring ethical and religious limits."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":""},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":""}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Accepted from SEP, IEP, SKS, bibliography rows, and Kierkegaard work chronology.","Relevant to irony, critique, subjectivity, authorship, literary philosophy, and the relation between negative freedom and ethical life."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Accepted from SEP, IEP, SKS, bibliography rows, and Kierkegaard work chronology."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}