Commentary on Boethius’s De hebdomadibus
{"WorkMasterId":7918,"WpPageId":289998,"ParentWpPageId":189552,"Slug":"commentary-on-boethius-s-de-hebdomadibus","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/thomas-aquinas/commentary-on-boethius-s-de-hebdomadibus/","RelativeUrl":"theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/thomas-aquinas/commentary-on-boethius-s-de-hebdomadibus/","HasFullText":false,"RawHtmlLength":68722,"CleanHtmlLength":14817,"Kicker":"Philosophy Work","Title":"Commentary on Boethius\u0027s De hebdomadibus","Deck":"Commentary on Boethius\u0027s De hebdomadibus treats participation, being, goodness, and metaphysical predication.","BackLink":{"Text":"Back to Thomas Aquinas","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/thomas-aquinas/"},"AuthorCard":{"Label":"Author","Title":"Thomas Aquinas","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/thomas-aquinas/","MediaHref":"","ImageSrc":"https://chrisdeasy.com/wp-content/uploads/thomas-aquinas-01-portrait-3.jpg","ImageAlt":"Portrait of Thomas Aquinas","FilterTerra":"Western Europe","ClickText":"Thomas Aquinas","ClickHref":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/philosophers/thomas-aquinas/","Copies":["1225 CE – 1274 CE","Roccasecca, County of Aquino","Medieval Dominican scholastic philosopher of faith and reason, act and potency, essence and existence, divine simplicity, analogy, the Five Ways, natural law, virtue, beatitude, soul, Aristotle commentary, and Thomism."]},"ContextCards":[{"Label":"Period","Key":"Period:2","Title":"Medieval History","DateText":"500 CE – 1499 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/"},{"Label":"Era","Key":"Era:5","Title":"High Medieval","DateText":"1000 CE – 1299 CE","Url":"https://chrisdeasy.com/theos/humanities/philosophy/eras-of-thought/philosophers-of-medieval-history/philosophers-of-high-medieval/"},{"Label":"Composition","Title":"1259 CE","Url":"","DateText":""}],"DateNote":"Source-backed approximate composition date; large, unfinished, commentary, or disputed-question transmission is noted where relevant.","GeoCards":[{"Label":"Region","Key":"Region:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita","Key":"TerraAvita:1"},{"Label":"Terra Avita Region","Key":"TerraAvitaRegion:6"},{"Label":"Modern Country","Key":"Country:ITA:1"}],"OriginalTitle":"Expositio libri De ebdomadibus","Language":"Latin","DisciplineCards":[{"Label":"Primary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:metaphysics"},{"Label":"Secondary Discipline","Key":"Discipline:logic"}],"Tradition":"Scholastic Aristotelianism / Thomism","FullText":null,"CoreThesis":["Commentary on Boethius\u0027s De hebdomadibus treats participation, being, goodness, and metaphysical predication."],"Classification":{"AlternateTitles":"Commentary on Boethius\u0027s De hebdomadibus; On the Hebdomads","KeyConcepts":"Commentary on Boethius\u0027s De hebdomadibus; On the Hebdomads","Methodology":"Public source support.","Structure":"source context only"},"Arguments":["Commentary on Boethius\u0027s De hebdomadibus treats participation, being, goodness, and metaphysical predication."],"Influence":{"InfluencedBy":"","InfluenceOn":""},"Significance":["Registered as a source-backed Boethian commentary; dates are approximate and no full text is imported.","Commentary on Boethius\u0027s De hebdomadibus is registered as a direct Thomas Aquinas work. The page records source-backed dating, manuscript or edition context, and no-full-text status."],"EvidenceNote":["Registered as a source-backed Boethian commentary; dates are approximate and no full text is imported."],"MainSections":[{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Core Thesis","Paragraphs":["Commentary on Boethius\u0027s De hebdomadibus treats participation, being, goodness, and metaphysical predication."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Classification","Fields":[{"Label":"Alternate Titles","Value":"Commentary on Boethius\u0027s De hebdomadibus; On the Hebdomads"},{"Label":"Key Concepts","Value":"Commentary on Boethius\u0027s De hebdomadibus; On the Hebdomads"},{"Label":"Methodology","Value":"Public source support."},{"Label":"Structure","Value":"source context only"}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Arguments","Paragraphs":["Commentary on Boethius\u0027s De hebdomadibus treats participation, being, goodness, and metaphysical predication."]},{"Kind":"FieldSection","Title":"Influence","Fields":[{"Label":"Influenced By","Value":""},{"Label":"Influence On","Value":""}]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Significance","Paragraphs":["Registered as a source-backed Boethian commentary; dates are approximate and no full text is imported.","Commentary on Boethius\u0027s De hebdomadibus is registered as a direct Thomas Aquinas work. The page records source-backed dating, manuscript or edition context, and no-full-text status."]},{"Kind":"TextSection","Title":"Evidence Note","Paragraphs":["Registered as a source-backed Boethian commentary; dates are approximate and no full text is imported."]}],"SectionSequence":["Back Link","Work Title","Deck","Author","Period","Era","Composition","Date Note","Region","Terra Avita","Terra Avita Region","Modern Country","Original Title","Language","Primary Discipline","Secondary Discipline","Tradition","Core Thesis","Classification","Arguments","Influence","Significance","Evidence Note"],"Counts":{"ContextCards":3,"GeoCards":4,"DisciplineCards":2,"Links":11,"Sections":23,"Styles":2,"Scripts":1}}