LGBTQ+ employees feel left out

Visual form

Inclusion-gap comparison chart.

Layout / body structure

The chart is laid out as a comparison between LGBTQ+ employees and straight employees across multiple dimensions of inclusion. Reader moves through the inclusion dimensions one by one to see where the gaps open widest.

What is being compared

It compares self-reported inclusion experiences for LGBTQ+ employees and straight employees, especially around self-expression, resource accessibility, and protective mechanisms.

Measurement system

The page uses survey shares or gap measures across inclusion dimensions, so the viewer tracks how far apart the two groups are on each workplace experience metric.

Visible structure inside the graphic

The internal pieces are the inclusion-dimension labels and the paired group markers or bars attached to each one. The structure makes the size of the experience gap as important as the absolute level.

Main takeaway from the visual

The chart shows that LGBTQ+ employees do not experience the workplace as equally inclusive. The widest gaps appear in basic conditions of belonging and protection rather than in one isolated sentiment question.

Key standout values or extremes

The strongest emphasis falls on the biggest reported gaps in self-expression, access to resources, and protective mechanisms. The chart is built to show that these are the most visibly uneven parts of the inclusion experience.

Controls / sequence, when applicable

The visible controls change the chart view while keeping the same graphic structure.

Companion media, when applicable

There is no separate companion audio or video; the chart is the full visual on this page.